|
COLUMN
Rev Iwuchukwu
The
Church, Foundation And Its Life (1)
B ecause of God's Special favour to
me, I have laid the foundation like an expert builder. Now
others are building on it. But whoever is building on this
foundation must be very careful. For no one can lay any
other foundation than we already have, Jesus Christ” (1 Cor.
3:10-11).
A foundation makes sense only when
it is built upon. The foundation and building constitute an
aspect while the materials used form another aspect of the
structure. The materials used could be gold, silver, brass
or wood.
The Church at a time was an
anticipation, futuristic and yet a reality. The Church is
translated “Ecclesia” and it means “to call or Assemble”. It
is also translated in Greek as “Kuriakon” which means “To
belong to Christ”. This is a Catholic (Not Roman Catholic).
Catholic Church means universal Church which Christ alone
and no other one or denomination brought into being. Every
Christian organization or denomination came into being by
virtue of the Day of Pentecost irrespective of whether it is
Anglican Church, Roman Catholic, Assemblies of God Church,
Redeemed Brethren Mission, Four Square Church, Church of God
Mission, Methodist Church, Christ Army Church etc. All these
came as a result of the Pentecostal outpouring as recorded
in Acts 2.
The Theological argument that the
church started in the Old Testament does not hold enough
ground. This discourse is however not purely a theological
discussion. Christ died for both local and universal church.
The church is a spiritual entity with physical and human
structures, (Matthew 16:18; 18:17; Lev. 4:13; Acts 7:35; 1
Cor. 11:20; Rev 1:10; Acts 2:1-12).
The church started its initial
records from 120 to 3000 and then to multitudes. The church
that started with the Day of Pentecost will end in unity not
in isolation or segregation. The rapture or “being caught
up” in glory at the second advent of Christ on Earth. There
is the MILITANT CRUSADING CHRUCH that is visible and
actual, there is also the invisible, triumphant church made
up of those who have been glorified and are now in Heaven.
Doctrines Of The Church:
The doctrines of the church
universal include but not limited to Bibliology
(Bible-Scriptures), Theology (Science of God), Christology
(Christ) Pneonatology (Holy spirit), Anthropology (Man and
society), Soteriology (salvation from sin), Ecclesiology
(church and its practices) etc.
Organization Of The Church:
The organization differs from one
denomination to the other (Eph. 4:11-13; Acts 6; Eph. 2:20).
There is the Episcopal, Congregational systems of church
organization and the Representative also. The Episcopal
church denomination refers to the Apex spiritual and
physical control by the highest in the spiritual and
administrative hierarch. The one on top makes final decision
and such decision is not subject to debate. The
CONGREGATIONAL church denomination allows the members to
decide everything. The Brethren Church is a good example.
THE REPRESENTATIVE church
denomination allows a select few leaders with governmentally
invested power to direct the affairs of the church. In this
system, the Elders handle spiritual matters while the
Deacons take care of the temporal needs of the church. The
Bible recognizes basically five powerful church officers
such as Apostle, Prophet, Pastor/Teacher and Evangelist.
Generally, the Bible recognizes two more officers such as
Elders and Deacons.
ELDER as a word has three meanings
such as:
(1) Elder in terms of Age
and maturity (Luke 15:25; 1 Timothy 5:2)
(2) Elder as per the Old
Testament office-continuation of Israeli Elders (70) (Acts
4:5-23).
(3) Elder can also mean a
Name or Title for local church officer to whom is assigned
spiritual Authority.
“Episcopos” refers to Bishop while
“presybyteros” refers to Elder. These were involved in the
management of the local church and ministry in the word. A
distinction must be made between the RULING ELDER and the
TEACHING ELDER (1 Peter 5:2-4; 1 Timothy 5:17; 3:2-7; Titus
1:5). The highest office of Spiritual Leadership in the
Local Church was referred to, in a Bishop and an ELDER.
Bishop is descriptive of the office or position occupied.
The title does refer to fanfare or Robes as the 'robe does
not make a monk” the “Dog's collar” does not also make a
Pastor or Reverend (Clerical collar is also called Dog's
collar in some parts of the world). The “Elder” refers to
the Recognition of the person chosen to bear such a Name.
Deacons have much to do with
Temporal things including finances, food, clothes, welfare
etc while the Elders cater for the spiritual needs of the
church (1 Peter 5: 1-2). Such officers are not expected to
be religious/ denominational demagogues but as servant
leaders. They are not expected to impose their self-will on
the congregation so far they were appointed to serve the
membership. Such could be subjected to election, selection
or reelection by the people they serve. Their duties include
to discover and enact the general will of the people and the
scriptures.
Qualification:
Those so appointed, selected or
elected into such sensitive church offices must necessarily
know the sensitive nature of such offices or positions in
the church. In the early church, such officers were
APOSTOLICALLY appointed persons. Presently, in some churches
only the paid pastors are recognized as Elders of the Local
Church. In some other churches, Elders are terrible
disciplinarians as well as super spiritual Directors with
Pastors as Heads. Some Pastors are just ceremonial in their
church functions as they lack the apostolic authority to
change things for better. There are variations no doubt in
church forms but the qualifications must be the same as
enshrined in the Bible.
Ordinances Of The Church:
Ordinance could refer to order,
Rule, or statute made by an authority. Sacrament is not an
ordinance per se because it has the elements of rituals. The
followings are ordinances of the church Marriage, Baptism
(water/spiritual) the Lord's Supper. The Lord's Supper has
different connotation to different people. Some view the
Lord's Supper as standing for the “real flesh and blood” of
Jesus Christ. Can this be really true? I think not so. The
second view on the Lord's Supper is CONSUBSTANTIATION.
Consubstantiation which means
according to the adherents is a chemical change of the items
used in communion. The third view is the SYMBOLISM which
states that these items used in communion are mere symbols
of the Flesh and Blood of Jesus Christ. This is reflective
of the scriptural position (Lk. 22:10, Matthew 26:28; 1Cor.
11:26). The frequency of the Lord's Supper should either be
weekly or monthly. The meaning and manner by which it is
observed is crucial. Honesty and self-judgment are required
before individual participation.
Vocation Of The Church:
The Church has a divinely vocation
such as:
1. To glorify the Almighty
God through genuine worship and avoid sociological
strangulation.
2. To Evangelize the world
through the gospel of Christ and avoid “St. John's Syndrome
or loss of the First Love which results in not being cold or
hot (Rev. 3:15-16).
“I know all things you do, that you
are neither hot or cold, I wish you were one or the other!
But since you are like Lukewarm water, I will spit you out
of mouth!”
3. To Build each other to
maintain and achieve maturity in Christ Jesus.
4. To avoid stunted growth
or arrested development in the spirit.
5. To prepare for future
glory.###
EXTRA
Mouse
Builds Nest Egg In ATM With $20 Bills
A mouse found inside an automatic
teller machine along with a nest it had built with
chewed-up $20 bills gave an Oregon gas station employee the
surprise of her life. The mouse, discovered Thursday, had
thoroughly torn up two bills and damaged another 14 to line
his nest. Employee Millie Taylor said she screamed and
slammed the machine's door shut.
The bank replaced all the money
that wasn't extensively damaged, and the ATM has continued
to work just fine. The mouse also got a reprieve: He was
evicted from his nest but set free outside the station.
Other workers at the Gem Stop
Chevron in La Grande in eastern Oregon say they're mystified
about how the mouse got inside the machine.
Drunk Police Intern Arrested For
Impersonating Cop
A Madison police intern has been
arrested after he allegedly impersonated an officer to
detain three people. A police report said the 20-year-old
intern was drunk early Friday morning when he approached
three men. The man allegedly flashed his police intern
badge, claimed he was an undercover detective, pantomimed a
gun with his thumb and index finger and ordered the men to
the ground.
Police said he talked into his cell
phone saying he needed backup.
Authorities said he eventually let
the men leave, saying they were lucky.
Police arrested the man on
tentative charges of impersonating a police officer,
disorderly conduct and underage drinking. The police report
notes, "It is anticipated his internship will be ending."
Fans Urged To Drink Whisky To Ward Off Swine Flu
Russian soccer fans have been told
to drink whisky on their trip to Wales for next month's
World Cup qualifier to ward off the H1N1 swine flu virus,
the head of the country's supporter association (VOB) said
Monday.
"We urge our fans to drink a lot of
Welsh whisky as a form of disinfection," VOB head Alexander
Shprygin told Reuters.
"That should cure all symptoms of
the disease."
Russia's Health Ministry has issued a public warning against
traveling to Britain because of the spread of the H1N1 virus
but Shprygin said he expected at least several hundred fans
would go to Wales for the September 9 qualifier in Cardiff.
"Health officials say this virus is
very dangerous but being a fan myself I can tell you that
for a real fan nothing is more important than the well-being
of the team," said Shprygin, who also sits on the executive
board of the Russian FA.
"Russian fans don't fear anything
or anybody so this virus will not stand in our way of
supporting our team."
The Russian FA also said health
issues should not prevent fans from traveling.
"We don't want our team to be
without any support for such an important match so we urge
our fans to go to Wales despite the health warning," a
spokesman said.
Germany lead European Group Four with 16 points from six
games, one ahead of Russia, with Wales in fourth place on
nine points from seven matches.
Chinese Bride Trains Eye On Wedding
Dress Record
A Chinese bride is hoping to enter
the record books after getting married in a wedding dress
with a train more than 2 km (1.2 miles) long trailing behind
her.
It took guests more than three
hours to roll out the gown, complete with 9,999 silk red
roses attached to it, in the northeastern province of Jilin,
state news agency Xinhua said.
"Both the length of the dress and
the number silk roses pinned on the wedding dress can make
history," the report quoted groom Zhao Peng as saying.
Zhao, who has applied to Guinness
World Records, said he was inspired after seeing a story on
the previous record holder in Romania, where the dress
measured just over 1.5 km.
"I do not want a cliche wedding
parade or banquet," he said.
Bride Lin Rong "laughed and cried
at the romantic gesture," Xinhua said.
The dress cost around 40,000 yuan
($5,856), which prompted initial opposition to the plan from
his family.
"It is a waste of money in my
opinion," said Zhao's mother. "Though I understand that he
wants to show his love on the big day."
($1 = 6.830 Yuan)
NM Thieves Steal Coins, New TV...
And Man's Ashes
A woman in New Mexico wants the
burglars who broke into her home to return something she
can't buy or replace: her son's ashes. KOAT-TV reported
Wednesday that Dianna Towndrow's home in Los Chavez was
broken into last week and the thieves took a wooden box
containing the cremated remains of her son, Dave.
Towndrow said her 20-year-old son
drowned in 2000 and that she kept his ashes, personal items,
and his birth and death certificates in the box thinking "it
would all be safe and sound."
Towndrow said the thieves also took
some silver coins and her new flat screen TV, but all she
wants back is her son.
She said it's hard "to lose him
twice."
She's asking for the return of the
ashes to Belen's Riverside Funeral Home, no questions asked.
Protesters Back Woman In Trousers
Case
Police used teargas to disperse
protesters rallying in support of a Sudanese woman facing 40
lashes for wearing trousers in public Tuesday, a case that
has become a public test of Sudan's indecency laws.
Lubna Hussein, a former journalist
and U.N. press officer, was arrested with 12 other women
during a party at a Khartoum restaurant in July and charged
with being indecently dressed.
Women's groups have complained that
the law gives no clear definition of indecent dress, leaving
the decision of whether to arrest a woman up to individual
police officers.
Dozens of men and ululating women
gathered outside a Khartoum court room where Hussein
appeared Tuesday, carrying banners with the message "No
return to the dark ages" and "Lubna's case is a case for all
Sudanese women."
Speaking after the hearing, Hussein
said the judge had adjourned her case until September 7.
"They want to check with the U.N. whether I have immunity
from prosecution. I don't know why they are doing this
because I have already resigned from the United Nations. I
think they just want to delay the case," she told Reuters.
Hussein said she resigned from her
U.N. job last week to give up any legal immunity so that she
could pursue the case to prove her innocence and challenge
the decency law.
Journalists were allowed into the
downtown court building, but a line of police prevented them
from entering the room where the case was heard.
Hussein went on to greet her
supporters, gathered on a traffic island, then led them on a
march, blocking a busy road. In a rare and short
unauthorized rally, they flashed V-for- Victory signs and
received supportive hoots from passing cars.
Armed riot police advanced toward
the crowd, beating their shields with batons. Officers later
fired teargas canisters into the air, forcing the crowd to
disperse.
"We are against this law. It is
against women, against Islam and against human rights," said
Zainab Badradin, one of the women in the crowd.
"I want to send a message to the
government to stop harassing women," said Nusayba Abdel
Mahmoud, 20, who came to the rally wearing jeans. "This is
what I wear. It is normal."
Indecency cases are not uncommon in
Sudan, where there is a large cultural gap between the
mostly Muslim and Arab-oriented north and the mainly
Christian south.
Hussein has attracted attention by
publicizing her case, posing for photos in her loose green
trousers and inviting journalists to campaign against dress
codes sporadically imposed in the capital.###
COLUMN
By Emma Okah
Cancer Centre: Before We Crucify Turai Yar'Adua
The fund-raising effort of Turai,
wife of President Umaru Musa Yar'Adua, in the FCT the other
week to give bite to her campaign against cancer has
scratched up both funds and criticisms. We are told that the
centre is designed to handle cancer diagnosis, treatment and
research at a top level. A section of the polity is
excitedly condemning the entire exercise, seeing corruption
through it.
The problem with excessive
criticism especially from the opposition is that it seems to
see nothing good in anything and this beclouds the essence
of constructive debate. A piece of logic says when
everything is right, something is wrong. This therefore goes
that when everything is wrong, something is right. The
problem in our polity however is that the nation has been
deceived so much so far that it seems to entrench in the
citizens to see nothing good anymore from the public domain.
Each time a first lady launches for
funds for the establishment of one project or the other, the
opposition seems to vibrate with condemnation. In my
opinion, the time to vibrate is late. We are all usually
there when the office of first lady is set up in the
presidency in each regime right from General Johnson
Aguiyi-Ironsi to date. We are usually there when she
announces her programme or NGO and we say nothing. We search
the budgets and find that no money is appropriated to her
office, and we go to bed. We are usually there when she
announces her agenda of action and begins to travel round
the country or state (in the case of a state first lady),
and we see nothing wrong in it. The moment she executes a
launching and the billions begin to roll in, we cry blue
murder.
Those who do not want to hear
anything about the International Cancer Centre being
promoted by the first lady should first of all review what
cancer means and how it is treated so far in the country.
Cancer is not a new ailment, even if its cure has remained
elusive. Even before the 12 century, the Romans, who had
advanced in science and philosophy, had discovered the
illness and gave it the name; crab, probably because of its
creeping nature beneath the skin or deep in the body organs.
Health experts reckon there are
about 500,000 cancer cases in Nigeria every year even though
the WHO thinks of 100,000. In 2005, 89,000 Nigerian women
were thought to have died of breast cancer. About 12,500
also died of cervical cancer during the same period. Also of
significance is the fact that the disease, unlike others,
does not discriminate in terms of gender, age as well as
social or economic class.
Cancer is a malignant tumour, often
an outgrowth caused when cells multiply uncontrollably,
destroying healthy tissues especially in the prostate
glands, liver, bones, brain, breast and cervix as well as
the lymph in children. It is simply a radical behaviour of
cells in the body. The different forms are sarcomas,
carcinomas, leukemias, and lymphomas. This causes several
other illnesses. It is a fast-spreading bad phenomenon;
usually something negative, that develops or spreads quickly
and usually destructively. This is why Nigeria must wake up
fast to this challenge.
Now, as food consumption is
endangered through production of foodstuff from genetically
manipulated sources and preservatives of all kinds as well
as differing temperatures and microbes, it is obvious that
the cells of the human body are behaving most radically.
This is evidenced in the strange behaviour of children of
today, and the crab-like progress of the youths of this
generation. Cancer is indeed a present danger, medically,
socially, economically, and otherwise.
Yes, huge sums were realized at the
launch by the first lady, but whether the project would
survive may be another matter. The hidden clause in the
effort to set up the International Cancer Centre (ICC) is
that it may turn out to be a worthwhile venture that may
outlive the present administration, just like Mariam
Abacha's did. It may change our national image in the health
sector and within the context of the MDGs.
Many of us may have forgotten that
the National Hospital Abuja was a private initiative of the
wife of the late maximum ruler, Mrs Mariam Sanni Abacha
which the Gen Abdulsalami Abubakar's regime took over by
Decree in 1999. Admitted that Mrs Abacha is not of very high
educational endowment but she has today touched many lives,
even more than her late husband. She succeeded where Health
Ministers who are professors failed. The hospital began as
another NGO project but today, it has emerged as a centre of
medical excellence in the seat of power in Nigeria, a
flagship of some sort. It is the best public hospital we
have in Abuja today. If that money was stashed away like the
other billions of Dollars we read about, we would all be
jostling in the same debate of looted funds and trapped
loot.
It was Mrs Maryam Babangida that
established the International Women Centre which today plays
crucial roles in the tourism sub-sector. It is now a
low-cost hotel facility for women coming into Abuja, and
this helps to guarantee healthy and decent lodging for
family people. There are other worthy centres around the
country established by wives of governors still giving
meaning to life. True, there are many failed projects and
others that fizzled out with their benefactors.
Anyone who has not nursed or looked
after a cancer patient will hardly appreciate the danger the
sickness presents to us in this country where health
facilities are scanty. The men suffer most from prostrate
cancer while the women often fall to breast cancer. A
prominent journalist once narrated his ordeal before his
ailing wife who later died of breast cancer. The pain he
communicated in the narration was enough to bring down tears
from any sympathizer. It is an agony that mangles logic and
defiles pacification.
At the moment, there is no strong
local centre to manage the incurable ailment. The media is
full of pleas from afflicted Nigerians asking for assistance
to fund cancer treatment abroad. What we see is traffic to
foreign cancer institutes by the rich and the wealthy. This
has raised fresh agitation that our democracy is for the
rich. Much money is being pumped abroad by wealthy Nigerians
in search of medical tourism, as they call it in the tourism
sector. The middle and lower class cannot afford to travel
abroad to get the same benefit. Our major streets are often
assaulted by the sights of cancer ravaged patients who beg
for money to eat. The horrors can only be abhorred.
Democracy or the dividends cannot
be reserved for the rich only, and no country develops for
the rich alone. The rich and the poor must co-exist, else a
revolution is on the way.
This is why the ICC and the effort
that goes with it must be supported by those who are
interested. The least we can do is pray for it to be another
success, because it can become another monumental
achievement in the medical history of Nigeria. I can see a
place where the middle class or even the common man with
cancer problems can run to and get about the same care that
is given abroad. If this ends up to be the fate of this baby
called ICC, then it is worth the effort.
The danger of excessive attack on
well-intended projects is the tendency to scare away donors
and make those who made pledges to do a rethink. It also
casts doubts that often scare away foreign donors who
usually do not want to dabble into scandalous issues in
foreign countries. The West regards the opposition as the
authentic voice of the people, and this is why the
opposition elsewhere offers constructive criticisms rather
than destructive condemnation.
This is not saying the promoters of
the Centre should not listen to the criticism and learn a
thing or two from it. At least, the first lady must realize
that doubt and incredulity has risen to a national attribute
and eccentricity. She should ensure that nobody drags her
name to the mud by fleecing the centre of its funds. The new
nature of Nigeria is for scandal to trail every single
project or person that had served in a big office. Mrs Turai
Yar'Adua can avoid this and go ahead to leave behind a
legacy of credibility instead of shame. Mrs Mariam Babangida
and Mariam Abacha are not in office today and irrespective
of their shortcomings or what Nigerians think about their
husbands, these women have left solid structures that the
eyes can see and hands can touch. The choice is for Mrs
Turai Yar'Adua. For a nation in search of role models, any
contribution by anybody in high office towards the good of
the society should be encouraged and not damned. Gradually,
we shall overcome our hopelessness and get there someday. I
believe we should give her a chance.###
COLUMN
BY PATRICK
The Trials of
Evangelist Helen Ukpabio (1)
Wednesday, July 29, 2009, was the
last Wednesday of that momentous month called JULY. That
Wednesday was the climax in the dreadful drama that swept
some states of the northern part of Nigeria like a fatal
thunderstorm. It was that Wednesday that the Nigerian
security operatives deployed their uttermost violence
against the Mohammed Yusuf led Boko Haram, the Islamic group
operating in the north. The Nigeria Police exhibited its
bestiality and executed the 39-year-old Yusuf, leader of the
Islamic sect. Alhaji Buji Fai, a politician and an
ex-commissioner for Religious Affairs in Borno State who the
police claimed, is a backer of Boko Haram was also,
summarily executed. That Wednesday wasn't too good. The
Wednesday was in the week of that maximum madness.
The Nigerian state Boko/Haram
tumult took much of the attention of some Nigerians and the
wider world these past days. My attention and others were
not on that; ours was on the casualties arising from
offensive cast by hundreds of monstrous militants faithful
to Evangelist Helen Ukpabio, a Nollywood (Nigerian movie)
star and head of the Liberty Foundation Gospel Church. The
militias acting on her order raided a child rights symposium
and disrupted it. The Nigerian Humanist Movement (NHM), a
national not-for-profit organization that campaigns to
promote science, reason, human rights and humanist ethics in
partnership with Stepping Stones Nigeria, a United Kingdom
(UK) based registered charity working to protect, save and
transform the lives of vulnerable and disadvantaged children
in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria had organized the
crucial conference.
The Southern part of Nigeria the
rainforest zone, is characterized by intense rainfall from
April to November every year. However, the weather over
Calabar, the capital of Cross River State was bright and
amiable on that Wednesday. Some of us who are NHM members
and other non-governmental organization (NGO) activists who
had journeyed from far and near had gathered at the Success
Hotels Limited. That modistic and delightful Success Hotel
sets on the northern axis of the green and clean Calabar
city. At about 8:30am on that Wednesday, we had just
commenced our procession in a small group with two banners
held by other members while we marched behind them. We were
led by Leo Igwe, the bespectacled, passionate and good-humoured
executive secretary of NHM. Costumed in white T-shirts with
the inscriptions at its front, “Child abandonment is immoral
and illegal; Belief in Witchcraft is no excuse; Stop it
now”.
“Please come and join us” we
chorused discordantly as we distributed leaflets about the
event, while we marched in triumphant mood to the venue. The
conference centre is an average dimension rectangular
auditorium at the Cultural Centre Complex, and some few
metres away from the hotel. As we arrived there, we streamed
into the hall, but other participants from Nigeria and
beyond had arrived before us. As usual, we swapped sally
with one another. Few minutes after, Leo moved to the
rostrum to pick the microphone and said “very soon we will
start,” I responded jokingly “You better start in time and
not the Nigerian time”.
We were about to start the business
of the day at about 10:30am when suddenly a gang of
furious-looking young men, women and few old ones wore
orange coloured T-shirts boldly written on it, “Liberty
Foundation Gospel Ministries” marched in columns like a
band of soldiers going to war, chanting loudly and
repeatedly, “We are Christ Soldiers going to the battle in
the Name of Jesus we shall Conquer”. They later splashed
into the hall like angry bees sprouting for a vicious bite.
They took over the stage, singing without talking to any of
us. Their songs rent the air in the place; while a young man
in his early 40s, ordered his “troops” to stop the combatant
melody. He raised his left hands toward us and declared it
aloud and angrily, “… If you don't believe that there are
witches it means you don't believe in God. Stepping Stones
Nigeria is an illegal organization. This conference won't
hold” And at interlude of his declarations, the bigots would
shout wildly, “It is decreed”. I got up and walked weakly
from a small plastic chair I had perched switching my
curious eyes into that of Leo, and inquired, “Leo! What is
happening?. “I don't know what they mean” fixing his eyes on
the invading militants rather than me, he replied casually.
I was deeply disturbed about the
safety of those who had traveled with me from Port Harcourt,
the capital of Rivers State, not mine. Nigeria is a jungle
and I am used to the torment of jungle life. In my team were
Gaia Sprocati, the slender Italian activist and researcher
who works for the London-based non-profit making group,
Stakeholders Democracy Network (SDN), and her Nigerian
colleague, Pius Dukor. I was also worried about the safety
of Peter Bloom, the American citizen, a journalist and
activist who is in Nigeria, to offer some technical
assistance to the Centre for Environment, Human Rights and
Development (CEHRD); CEHRD is a non-governmental
organization based in Rivers State that I coordinate. I was
also weighed down by the worry for the safety of Dr.
Enyeribe Onouha, a traditional ruler from Imo State who quit
the Catholic priesthood and took to humanism. He is the
chairman of NHM. It was a Wednesday of Madness! And Igwe was
already a hostage held by the assailing Ukpabio's zealots. I
turned to Mr. Placid, a Superintendent of Police, sent by
Ibrahim Ahmed, the new police boss in the state to attend
the forum. Placid was helpless too, he roosted in his chair
to watch the unfolding sardonic drama.
The hall was choked with
commotion. Some members of the fanatics went wild into some
violent mental derangement with their left hands raised up,
pricking the air pointlessly, while blinking their eyes and
trembled like a patient afflicted with the ailment of
sporadic muscular contractions. And at intervals screamed
uncontrollably, “Holy Ghost fire consume them”, God of
Elijah send down your fire…”. The evangelical curses were
quite endless and noisy. Amidst the uproar, some of them
mostly in their late 20s and mid 30s, roaring from one
corner of the hall to another still held poor Leo hostage.
He was strapped to them like a defenseless chicken in the
claws of a wicked hawk. I decided to go for his rescue; I
struggled with them, but when they over-powered me they cut
off Leo's leather bag tied to his neck containing his
cloths, books, money, phone, digital camera and the address
he was suppose to read at the occasion. They disappeared
with the bag after inflicting bodily harm on him. His blood
splattered on my shirt. That was Leo in the hands of those
ignorant maniacs loyal to Evangelist Helen Akpabio. That
Wednesday was a day of madness in Calabar. A team of
Policemen arrived the scene to chase away the militants who
besieged the halls, but the security officials were small in
number. They couldn't afford to confront hundreds of the
unscrupulous belligerents. Several hours after, the police
reinforced with more personnel and recaptured the place from
them.
A certain Jeffrey Bassey, one of
the militants who was visibly proactive during the attack,
was arrested by the police. He wrote in his statement to
police that they acted on the orders of Evangelist Helen
Ukpabio, but denied stealing Leo's bag. Surprisingly, Tony
Effiom, a Calabar-based attorney working for Ukpabio later
tendered Leo's address which was in the stolen bag as an
“exhibit”, and lied to the police that Leo Igwe distributed
it before his clients attacked him. Effiom should know more
about the stolen bag! I am a member of the pen fraternity,
but the Nigeria media is one of the problems of this
society. The Ukpabio Nollywood drama of folly took place
before the watchful eyes of reporters from leading Nigeria
newspapers and local radio stations in Nigeria. And
lamentably, there was no mention of it in the media. Instead
what monopolized the media space then was the Boko Haram
report. After all the troubles we later re-grouped and held
a successful conference on the theme, “Child Rights and
Witchcraft”. Special thanks to James Ibor, a promising
Calabar-based lawyer who offered professional services
during the Ukpabio's mess, and Jim Kelly Abegbe, another
upcoming statistician and humanist. He is a courageous young
man who re-mobilized the attendees after the attacks and we
held the teach-in.###
COLUMN
FOR FACE OF THE LAW
In
Defence of Man: Who Marginalizes The Woman?
T Oday, all over the world, the
woman complains of being marginalized and placed in a second
fiddle to a man. The third world countries especially
Nigeria parades the greatest number of women crusading
against the marginalization of womanhood. On the radio,
screens and in the prints woman liberation has become the
daily and popular jingle. The pulpits have joined in the
marginalization crusade and so even in the churches and
mosques female marginalization gradually become a second
sermon, yet the real woman knows the truth about the
position and conditions of womanhood.
The questions that the woman
crusader has failed to answer is who marginalized the woman.
The simplest answer to this poser is that the perceived
marginalization or the problem of woman is caused by woman
herself. How do we mean?
We shall examine the following
sub-heads to concretize our assertion.
The Girl Child Question
More often than not one hears woman
complaining that the status of the girl child is second
class in the society. The truth is that the woman/mother
knows that in any society nature (not man) has so destined
that the man or boy child is as the scriptures put it the
head of the house. So when a woman gives birth to a boy even
herself is glad. You hear the mother saying that she has
built a home by that act. In the contrast, if she gives
birth to only female children she remains worried. In this
instant case, is it not natural that the boy child is
superior to the girl child? How can God create two things
and make them equals? It is not possible unless he (God)
made it so, which he did not. We should stop deceiving
ourselves to say that God created man and woman as equal. No
one can point to such areas or verse in either the Bible or
the Koran.
It is on the strength of this, that
make even the mother to more often than not choose the early
training of the boy child. Believe it or not, no woman not
even the so called women crusaders would except by mere
precepts or in principles like to give birth to not at least
a male child. Not only because of societal resentment but
the natural feeling of absence which she too has. She can
only suppress it momentarily but deep inside her she
eternally feels it.
There is reported a situation where
a husband whose mother gave birth to only boys told his
newly wedded wife that he had prayed to God for only female
children and that his Pastor told him just before the
marriage that God had revealed to him that his prayer's have
been answered and the wife threatened to leave the
matrimonial home should such prayer be real.
Who then is marginalized, the girl
child? Infact, research and statistics have shown that in
some part of the country (Nigeria) male children sacrifice
their chances of going to school for their sisters. Hence
they go into trades from which they finance their sisters in
schools. This is typical of the Ndigbos especially the
Anambra people. Among the Nembe people of the Ijaws and
among the Ashanti people of Ghana the law of inheritance is
maintained. Does this amount to matrilineal. Does this
amount to marginalization of the woman or girl child by
man?. The Yoruba's recently recorded a female regent to the
throne of the Oba. What do we call this? Marginalization?
Women Living Together
Girls are of course the off-shoot
of their mothers. What is inbuilt in their mothers is what
they display any where they are seen. Women are by nature
always conscious of themselves anywhere, any day. They can
by nature only accommodate themselves only if the nearest
woman has nothing to indicate a possible competition.
If in any event, the next woman in
the environment offers any competition instead of competing
with her contemporary, a woman will offer resistance, anger,
hatred and infact threat for a healthy competition. The
result of this is concomitant quarrels, gossiping and in the
end fight will eventually ensue. The pathetic event in this
struggle is that no women sees himself as small or put it
lucidly a middle class to another woman. It is clearly
difficult to meet two woman sitted without discussing
another woman with all passion. The level of jealousy among
women is purely unimaginable. Where their number is much,
they will certainly form groups, gossiping group. And in the
end, the question is, what is the problem of women? Is it a
man that makes them behave the way they are behaving? Even
among Pastors wives, there are these groupings. These
gossiping groups, which go to show that a woman is a woman
anywhere and whatever she is.
The Second, Third Etc Wife Question
One of the major reasons why woman
insist on marriage under the statute erroneously referred to
as court marriage or white wedding is to protect and secure
their marriages. A woman would not like her husband to marry
the second wife not even the third wife. This is as a result
of the inability of women to accommodate themselves and not
for the purposes of religious or scriptural sanctity as they
claim. They also don't want their husband to have affairs
outside marriage. Off course this is evil and a big chart on
the woman.
However, the question arises, this
person that always disturb a married man and who is ready to
be married as a second or third wife, is she not a woman?
The gospel and home truth is that a woman only detests
second wife syndrome only when she is the first wife, but
majority of woman today don't give a damn whether or not
they are first wives. The same girl who was here yesterday
saying God forbid that she should be a second wife is the
same girl that will even wed as a third wife today.
The fact remains that if woman
adhor this syndrome let them take a position against it and
let them not turn tomorrow to be violating the position. How
will a women be here campaigning against the position while
the other is celebrating in the crime. It is true that a
woman is being married as a second, third, fourth or even
fifth wife she invites fellow woman who jubilate and
celebrate with her. Why is it so? Why is it that girls
hostels in school always display fleet of assorted cars
every week end parked by “Sugar-Daddies”?. These are girls
who are or will tomorrow campaign against the same act.
These are girls who are not ignorant of the fact that these
sugar daddies have wives and female children also. So while
one woman is wailing her piteous condition, another woman or
girl is jubilating. Why can't women take a position and stop
deceiving themselves blaming their problems on man.
How many boys in any given school
succumb to a “Sugar mummy”? even the rare cases of sugar
mummies are orchestrated by the woman involved. Why won't
girls as under graduates or whatever at least fight this
epidemic while in school? Is it not a social time bomb? It
is not a malign development. Let women arise and blaze up
and not blame woes on man.
Women And Politics
One distinctive characteristic
problem of women is found in politics. From women liberation
campaign women started political adventures. Indeed, some of
them are forces in the game of politics and are therefore
very useful.
However, the biggest obstacles
facing women in politics is their fellow women. If a woman
happens to contest with a man, her major opponent is not the
man she contests against but women. This is because a woman
finds it difficult to support her fellow woman against a
man.
She will see the woman politician
as being too unwomanly to challenge a man in a political
feast, she will believe that she cannot make it and so would
be a lame battle to contest with a man at all.
Naturally, by the numerical
strength of the woman folk, no man would have been able to
successfully challenge a woman in a political battle.
How many times has a woman
contested an election and secured massive support from the
women folk? Has it not always been the man that has always
made the few women what they are in politics? Is it still
the man that marginalizes the woman?
It is also observed that woman
always believes which belief is right that a man must head
them even in their gatherings. This is more so in their
various associations, unions and so on. There is therefore
hardly a gathering of women that men are not represented
either as a Patron, Adviser, Financier and so on. Among
local women bodies, they do seek a man leader or man
secretary to assist them in the conduct of their affairs. Is
it the man that is marginalizing them here? Women may wish
to forgive me if I sound harsh but I just had to be brutally
frank.###
Culled from my book Entitled
“The Armagedon Of Women”
THE MENACE OF
CHURCH POLITICS (2)
By Dr. Lewis Akpogena
One important fact about good
leadership is the fact that leaders produce other leaders.
Some people believe that leaders are born and not made;
others say that leaders are made and not born. But [ believe
that it is a balance to say that leaders are born and made.
By that I believe that some men are born with some given
talents or qualities of leadership and these qualities need
to be developed to make them real leaders. The process of
leadership development can only thrive where those already
in leadership are not politically minded. Then they will
begin to train and delegate responsibilities to potential
leaders. Such good leaders will on their own scout for, and
recruit men with leadership potentials, and will be willing
to see those younger ones succeed thern even while they are
yet alive. But such a laudable plan and process of
leadership development and succession is bound to hit the
rock wherever church politics gain ascendancy. The
power-thirsty leaders do not recognize leadership
potentialities in younger, fellow ministers. Rather than
recognizing and helping to develop younger ministers, the
politically minded leaders tend to be obsessed with jealousy
and are so paranoid at seeing the younger aspiring leaders,
(who they refer as their rivals) that they will start
persecuting them Like the tyrant king Herod who killed all
newly born babies in his days, the politically minded church
leader will seek means to eliminate their supposed rivals -
the young, aspiring leaders. Church politicians like their
counterparts in the world have a slogan, viz, "Up me and I
will up you" in other words they show favour to mernbers of
the clique rather than to the generality of the membership.
The fact the Church politics breed
innumerable social evils like, hatred, bitterness, rancour,
acrimony, strife, and even murder, cannot be over
emphasized. A story has been told of two church deacons in a
well-known church in Nigeria who lost their post during an
end-year election and went away in their bitterness,
conspired and literally murdered the pastor in charge. Very
shocking! Isn't it, but that is just a little bit of the
sour taste of fiuit produced on the soil of any Church where
the seed of politics is sown and allowed to grow. It is
always, survival of the fittest during elections. Human
brain and cleverness replace the superintending guiding
ministry of the Holy Spirit in the church of Jesus Christ.
What a mess! While it is true that some young ministers of
God are themselves politically ambitious and insorboninate
to authorities; and while it is also true that some of them
do as a result split churches, it is equally true that some
"super-leaders" or the "Founder-God-ordained-soleleaders" do
suppress, and victimize the young and promising leaders and
so frustrate them Only God in heaven knows the degree of
troubles, harms, and set-backs His churches on earth suffers
as a result of church politics.
Solutions to the menace of church
politics: Before we can think constructively on how to stop
politics in the church we must first of all see it as a
great evil. We must be alarmed by its devastating effects on
the church of God. And we must be willing to reject it as an
alternative system of church leadership. Having done this,
we should then look to God for what he has to say on the
issue of church leadership. The following points should be
care fully considered: Recognize the difference between the
church and tile world. The practice of politics in the
church is indeed as a result of failure to recognize the
sharp difference between the church order and the world
order. The church is more than an organization it is equally
an organism; it is the mystical body of Jesus Christ and
God's kingdom on earth. It is of heavenly origin, and an
integral part of God's own family on earth. Therefore, her
rules, standards, principles of government, etc, must needs
conform to the heavenly order, and have the endorsement of
God, the father/King.
Recognize the life, law, and spirit
of the Church. The church should never be run like a social
club, or the same ways the political states or governments
are run. The word of God not that of men should be the final
authority. The blood of Jesus and not human tie or affinity
should be the unifying factor in the church. And, the Holy
Spirit and not the human brain should be the ever-present
guide and controller of lives and actions of members of the
church; this means that the church must exhibit the kind of
life, practice, and attitudes that agree with the Holy
Scriptures. The church should never condone carnal or
worldly spirits. Spirituality and divine life should be the
guiding principles for every member of the church. Have a
carefully written, Bible-based church Manual. Upholding and
maintaining of scriptural standards in the church should be
cemented by a careful entrenchment of such scriptural
principles into the church manual or constitution. The
character and qualifications of those who would hold any
church office should be enforcement which is the most
crucial aspect of the job. Church rules, criteria, and
standards do no good unless they are enforced by those
concerned. Enforcement of church rules, etc; should be done
without any partiality, irrespective of people's social
status. By so doing unspiritual men shall be weeded out or
prevented from occupying church offices. And with the strict
adherence to the above well proven principles, church
politics is bound to die a natural death.
Fortunately there are some
Christian denominations where politics is not allowed to
hamper the progress of God's business. Members are not
allowed to hamper or strive for church posts, or struggle to
grab leadership positions. They are taught to accept church
offices with fear and trembling and with a sense of
responsibility - as God's stewards. This is not to say that
there are no members in those groups with worldly ambitions
for leadership. The point is the fact that such churches are
guided by spiritual principles and standards that ensure
that politically minded members do not have. their ways. It
is a pity that there are just too few Churches in the world
today that are not plagued with the menace of church
politics. This piece is aimed at affecting a leadership
reform in Christian churches, and this is to alert the
churches of God of the EVILS AND DANGER of politics in God's
church and to suggest some lasting solutions to the
devil-inspired anomalies that have been hampering the
progress of the church. The bitter truth is presented here.
The universal problem every sincere Christian faces in the
churches is exposed here. It is left to every denomination
to resolve to wage a holy war against the age-long, nagging
monster, and live to see its complete demise in God's
church. This can be done by a faithful application of the
principles such as raising the spiritual standard of the
church's life high, and bringing the governmental system of
the church to a spiritual and scriptural height as God would
have it. Of course, someone must be willing to risk his life
to speak out for God in total conderrmation of the evils of
church politics, and to contend for the maintenance of
scriptural standards in the Church of God.
Defeat of church politics does not
necessarily require crises or "storm" in the church. But it
certainly calls for a proper orientation in the church as
far as leadership is concerned. There has to be well planned
process of education of people of God relating to
qualification for church leadership. Every member is
entitled to know, among other things, the scriptural
imperatives relating to the qualifications of the church
leaders. People of God must be made to have visions of what
the main objectives of the church of Christ on earth are.
They should be made to know that their priorities should be
place on pleasing God in their individual lines, as well as
contributing to the accomplishment of God's missionary task
on earth. When the eyes of God's people are thus opened to
eternal realities, and when they are organized to take their
proper positions and engage activities in their Lord's
business (the GREAT COMMISSION), I believe they will have no
problem hating and denouncing such a carnal phenomenon as
Church politics. At least most of them will like to obey and
follow God's word, and His Holy Spirit, rather than
following the ways and the wisdom of men. They will love to
belong to the "Universal Jesus People's Party (UJPP); rather
than belonging to any human clique in the church, which is
set for political reasons. To belong to the UJPP simply
means to belong to universal brotherhood of all true
Christians loving one another and having fellowship with one
another in God's church. Credit goes to my brother and
colleague for his scholarly work that I have adapted on this
subject, Rev. Emmanuel M. C. Ibeh. Have any question, you
may call: 08055059656, or write akpogena0J,yahoo.com Stay
blessed.###
DISCOURSE
Re: 'Odili Cannot Hijack Rivers AC’...Suage
Badey Is Unconsciously Digging His Own Political Grave-By Our Political Reporter
And having looked to government for
bread, on the very first scarcity they will turn and bite
the hand that fed them”
- Edmund Burke
There could not be a better
description of the so-called Suage Badey, a political nymph
and controversial factional chairman of the Action Congress
in Rivers State.
Not even in the smallest of the
small States in the sub-Saharan Africa let alone Rivers
State can a political neophyte feel so free as to seek
relevance by picking on a man of honour, one of the names
and figures that gives meaning to our State in the comity of
nations under the pretext of impressing his paymasters.
Thank God, the State Governor, Rt.
Hon Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi is not the kind that is easily
impressed and, or deceived by such antics, moreso when the
malice is centred on his political master, Sir Dr Peter
Odili.
In that statement as reported by
The Port Harcourt Spectator newspaper, Suage Badey was
quoted as alleging that he has uncovered surreptitious moves
by the former State Governor, Sir Dr Peter Odili and the
then Secretary to the State Government (SSG) and former
Minister of Transport, Dr Abiye Sekibo to hijack the Rivers
AC with a view to destabilizing the Amaechi-led government.
Angered by the report which he
described as the highest level of intellectual profligacy, a
political commentator, Hon Dominic Saata, vice chairman,
Rivers Democratic Working Group (RDWG) and Chief James
Korobia Banyonwa, PDP chieftain of Bodo city in Gokana
Local Government Area of Rivers State, said Suage Badey is
unconsciously digging his own political grave in a bid to
satisfy his inordinate ambition of becoming force to be
reckoned with by government.
“Lost in self delusion of
impressing the State government, Badey as ignorant and
visionless as he is, could not remember that he is neither
of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) nor its
spokesperson. Rather than warn or reassure his party
faithfulls of the steadfastness of the AC leadership in the
State not to allow any infiltration if he was sure of the
dummy he was trying to sell, he betrayed his intention by
acting as Gov Amaechi's advocate unsolicited. What a
shame!”, They said.
Perhaps, Suage Badey and his
cohorts are yet to realize that Dr Peter Odili, Abiye Sekibo
and a few others notwithstanding the seeming political
impasse in the State cannot be wished away in the political
history of Rivers State.
Even if there were
misunderstandings between the present and past leaderships
as Badey was trying to suggest, does that create room for
mediocres like him to cast aspersion on the duo of Dr Odili
and Dr Sekibo. Does it not amount to a greater injury and
insult on the personality of Rivers State for the likes of
Suage Badey to carry such inciting and malicious stunts
further debased with loose and watery use of English
Language on these two illustrious sons of the State. Further
exposing himself as a confused political jobber, Suage Badey
in the same statement in which he tried to praise-sing the
State government and the ruling party under the leadership
of Gov Amaechi ended up slamming the party for misrule,
greed and plotting to perpetuate itself in office. He also
congratulated the Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Muhammed Sa'ad
Abubakar for openly accusing the ruling party of doing
nothing to stop the incidences of kidnapping, injustice,
corruption, armed robbery amid public outcry for social
amenities which are practically acting at all levels.
We regret that political jobbers
like Suage Badey is bereft of ideas that will move Rivers
State forward.
Suage Badey should be told that his
party, the AC is the actual party plotting at the State and
federal levels to destabilize the PDP led- government.
Suage Badey should rather seek ways
of how to plaster the wounds in the AC in Rivers State and
Gokana, his local government area.
He should also look at how to build
a credible image, rather than attempting to destroy profiles
of political leaders that have attained heights that he
cannot dream of.
In view of all this, it is only
instructive to advise the paymasters of Suage Badey to
launch a more insightful hunt for better and well schooled
propagandists and do away with chaffs in the mould of Badey
who will end up rubbishing themselves and their benefactors.
It's also imperative at this
juncture, to state categorically that there is no AC in
Rivers State let alone being hijacked by anybody. What
exists here is an extended arm and surrogate of the ruling
PDP composed of hungry touts using the name of the genuine
AC, such that obtains in Edo State and at the federal level.
Should Dr Odili and Sekibo wish to
declare for any other political party, definitely it can
neither be AC nor at the State level. They are much bigger
than local champions.
Commenting on the report by The
Port Harcourt Spectator, another political observer said,
“the likes of Badey and his paymasters who perhaps, may have
caught cold as a result of that malicious, baseless
falsehood for fear of being displaced from their beggarly
and gluttonous position where they feel satisfied and
comfortable feeding on crumbs falling from the PDP table
should be rest assured that there is no such threat. May God
help 'you' to remain in your much cherished position so that
sycophancy will continue to take a greater part of
'you'.”###
INTERVIEW
Oil Industry Reforms: The Devil Is In The
Detail
- Ajumogobia
Mr. Ajumogobia (SAN), Nigeria's
articulate, soft spoken, Harvard trained Minister of State
for Petroleum Resources needs little introduction. Recently,
the ministry of petroleum resources organized a
stakeholders' consultative forum on the Petroleum Industry
Bill before the National Assembly. Afterwards, he spoke with
Hector Igbikiowubo, Editor of Sweet Crude on the Petroleum
Industry Bill before the National Assembly, touching on
concerns by the international oil companies regarding the
sanctity of existing contracts and federal government's
amnesty for militants in the troubled Niger Delta.
Excerpts:
Sir yesterday, the ministry of
Petroleum resources organized a consultative forum where
stakeholders exchanged positions on the Petroleum industry
bill. Interestingly, even though some stakeholders had
earlier stated they weren't being carried along, it would
appear the forum marks a turning point especially with all
stakeholders suddenly expressing support for the bill. What
do you think accounts for this sudden turn around?
I think there was a bit of hysteria
over the bill initially and that is largely because people
are generally resistant to change, especially fundamental
change. The new petroleum industry bill is really
transformational change transforming the industry. For
example let me talk about something quite fundamental: we've
always talked about the upstream and the downstream. The
midstream has been ignored in terms of transportation,
transmission of fuel and gas. Now we have a new agency that
is going to be created to deal with that. But more
importantly, the thing the minister talked about in his
keynote address that was so fundamental is acreage
management where huge acreage have been given to companies
but they have not exploited it for about 40 years. So other
people who are ready and able to participate in the
industry, both local and foreign, we don't have any acreage
to give them. Yet, there are companies sitting on huge
acreage. These are fundamental issues and touching on some
of those issues is what has created the hysteria. But I
think what we saw yesterday was an alignment with the
reality that the legal and regulatory framework which
governs the industry needs to be reformed for the industry
to grow. Naturally there are going to be concerns from the
sectoral perspective. You heard the NARTO (National
Association of Road Transport Owners) representative talking
about with holding tax that is his' grief. The IOCs didn't
express any specific concerns but they may have some
concerns about what are the implications. What does it mean
in terms of the time line that has been given to them to
relinquish unused acreage. But like the saying goes, 'the
devil is in the detail'. But the law by its nature doesn't
always deal with all commercial issues which would be
discussed and agreed upon even after the bill has been
passed.
While speaking on behalf of the
IOCs. Mr. Fawthrop, the Managing Director of Chevron Nigeria
Limited had pointed out that there are issues that were not
clear that there is the need to clarify these issues before
the bill is codified.
Have these IOCs raised any aspect
of the ongoing reform that is of concern to them?
Not specifically, the whole concept
of interpretation of statute is a whole subject in legal
training. Every time you write something down, it is
susceptible to interpretation, depending on your
perspective. A good law, and I think the PIB (Petroleum
Industry Bill), is clear when you put it in the context of
the subject and part of the interpretation is interpreting
the words in their context. I think it is going to be
difficult for anyone to say you must draft a law that is not
capable of interpretation, it goes with legislation
interpreted in the context of the subject and that is why
laws will always have a purpose for which the law was made.
Now if there is any specific area where there is clear
ambiguity, where the meaning is unclear, then we will
address those, but nothing specific has been pointed out. We
hope that before the National Assembly, they would draw up a
memorandum. That is what we expect for example, 'section 253
of the bill is not clear because is clear when you refer
to minister of petroleum resources or whoever', something
like that. If there was that sort of ambiguity. Then of
course we shall look at it.
I spoke with Ali Moshiri Vice
President of Chevron Corporation in Houston, TX. USA on the
sidelines of the last Offshore Technology Conference (OTC)
and he raised issues concerning the 1993 PSC (Production
Sharing Contract) and he was a little concerned about
government plans to renegotiate it under the guise of the
ongoing reforms. Even Ann Pickard, the Vice President of
Shell E&P, Africa had raised concerns about the sanctity of
existing contracts. Can you please respond to these
concerns?
The 1993 PSCs had been an issue for
a while and we were in the process of actually renegotiating
them anyway and that by itself shouldn't be an issue. I
think the real issue is with the broad concerns about the
change in fiscal regime. I think that is what they are
talking about. For example, under the 1993 PSC, it is zero
royalty and the cost recovery mechanism makes it
unattractive revenue wise for the government. For a long
time, because the ratio of JVs or PSCs was in favour of the
JVs, government revenue was not so relatively affected. But
today, more of our production is offshore and there is
concern about our take. And when compared to global best
practices, in terms of what other oil producing countries
get, it is only practical that we should sit down with our
partners and review the situation, that's essentially what
this is about.
Is there provision in the 1993 PSC
agreement for such review?
Of course every agreement has
provisions for such review and especially when the issues
involved are of such a fundamental nature. I don't think
there has ever been any question about the review. What you
would hear them say is that they need to know what the new
fiscal terms would be. Because it is difficult to plan
unless you know what the fiscal terms are. And I think
yesterday we touched base on a few of these. In fact that
was the first formal interactive process by which specific
issues can be raised.
It is interesting to note Sir, that
since the ongoing reform exercise gathered momentum,
practically all ongoing projects in the industry had
stalled. How much longer do you think the industry can take
this wait and see approach especially in view of our current
economic realities?
I alluded to that in my brief
remark yesterday, I talked about transition and this is a
process that takes you from one regime to another. There are
existing contracts, there are contracts in the making and
there are proposed contracts. Basically people are concerned
about how the new regime is going to affect them how is it
going to affect what I have already, how is it going to
affect what is in transition, that is, the new thing that I
am proposing. There is a tendency for people to “wait and
see”, I think that is natural. But it is not going to be for
much longer. We are hoping that the bill would be passed
very shortly and once that is done, it would be clear to
everyone. That is the point that Dr. Lukman made which I
think is very important. This is a law of Nigeria, of
Nigeria and our partners who have been with us for the last
50 years in the case of Shell, have shown mutual respect and
given us a lot of value as we have offered them a lot of
opportunities to continue to operate and we believe that we
will continue to work together in our mutual interest. What
we will not do is let our partners draft the law that is
going to govern them, for us. I think there is obviously a
tension between government take and reasonable rate of
return on investment, I think that is the issue. So when you
hear the hysteria about the fiscal terms that is what it
boils down to. But when all is set and done what do we take
home having invested this much? And there is a point where
investments no longer make sense. We believe that the fiscal
terms that are in the PIB are reasonable and fair having
regard to what happens in other parts of the world, they say
not. I think that is the only issue that I can see and I
think some further dialogue is appropriate considering that
they are our partners, we have great regard for them and
they have added a lot of value to Nigeria and continue to do
so and we thought it only right to listen to them. That was
what this consultative forum was all about. It is not even
the first, there was a previous meeting, not with the
ministry but the OGIC (Oil and Gas Industry Committee)
during which they expressed some of their concerns. But at
the end of the day, the decision rest with the National
Assembly ultimately.
A concern about an earlier
provision was expressed yesterday and it had to do with the
unbundling of the NNPC. Now we hear talk of rather
consolidating the corporation. Would you like to address
that?
I think there is no conflict in
that. The reform in NNPC started with the breaking up of the
corporation into eleven business units and as part of the
strategy to make NNPC more commercial. What we are talking
about today is NNPC Limited, and integrated oil and gas
company that embraces all this business units, to give them
a certain level of autonomy to run the business. I think
that they are not mutually exclusive. The idea is not to
break up the company. It is to consolidate the business unit
but give them autonomy to be able to operate efficiently. A
particular case in point is that of the refineries which
until now have had to come to the NNPC board for approvals
of all sorts. They can't compete with the private refineries
and that is where the managing directors should be able to
take decisions regarding whatever the needs are. I think the
business units are adequately funded and given the
empowerment to run and make a return to the holding company
which should be able to make the dividend returns to the
federal government. It is a completely different structure
from what we have now where the NNPC takes money from the
federal government budget and next year it goes back again
for allocation. This time around once it's been capitalized
and that is after the passage of the bill. It will sink or
swim as other firms do based on its own action.
I notice that clear roles for
governors haven't been defined in the implementation of the
amnesty package by the federal government. What is your take
on this?
I think that the amnesty package is
a good thing, especially when you look at it within the
context of the origins of this conflict. Amnesty is
basically a pardon for people who might otherwise have been
prosecuted. And what the President is saying is that nobody
who has been involved in this would be prosecuted, would be
taken as if they've committed any crime. I know that there
has been a lot of rhetoric in the newspapers about this,
'you can't give amnesty to a person who has not been
convicted”. I think the language of the constitution is that
if you have been confirmed as having committed an offence,
then you might be granted an amnesty. I think the principle
of it is to say let by gone be by gone. These are young
Nigerians who have found themselves in a conflict situation,
have done things which may have against the law, and the
State is not going to look into those things. The State is
going to give a blanket reprieve to those people as a
platform for us to sit down and resolve issues in a peaceful
and productive way. I think it is a good thing. By its
nature, it involves all stakeholders and the governors are
critical stakeholders in that process. The local government
chairmen, traditional rulers all have a role to play and
these roles would be clearly defined as time goes on.###
ABUJA
ACROSS THE NATION
Clinton To Discuss Sectarian Violence With Yar'Adua
There were fresh indications that
the alleged extra-judicial killing of the Boko Haram leader,
Mohammed Yusuf, may have assumed a global dimension.
Reason: The issue is said to top
the agenda of the meeting scheduled next week Wednesday
between the United States (U.S.) Secretary of State, Hillary
Clinton, and top officials of the Federal Government.
The U.S. government confirmed that
the recent sectarian crisis and its management, including
the killing of the sect leader, would now be a significant
part of Clinton's talk with President Umaru Musa Yar'Adua
and Foreign Affairs Minister, Ojo Maduekwe. U.S. Assistant
Secretary of State, Ambassador Johnie Carson, said last week
in Washington DC that the U.S. Secretary would raise the
issue of the sectarian crisis in her Abuja talks.
According to Crowley, the U.S. has
been closely monitoring the situation in Nigeria, adding
that Mrs. Clinton would be there soon to discuss the matter.
Crowley said: "Obviously, there have been reports of
incidents, of clashes in northern Nigeria, and we are
monitoring the situation closely. And I think what is
happening in Nigeria will be a significant subject of her -
Mrs. Clinton - discussions with both the President and
foreign minister of Nigeria while she's there."
Last week while briefing the press
about what Clinton would discuss in Nigeria, the U.S.
Assistant Secretary of State for Africa, Ambassador Johnnie
Carson, had said "it's important to discuss with Nigeria a
range of issues. We are concerned about having a good energy
relationship with them. We're interested in seeing them
continue to play a positive regional role, including
providing peace-keepers to key conflict areas. We also
believe it is also important for them to deal with some of
their domestic issues. We'd like to see greater improvement
in their electoral performance, which will help to
strengthen their democracy."
However, news of Yusuf's killing
has filled the Internet and the Western press, including an
outright condemnation from the United Nations Human Rights
Commissioner on Tuesday from Geneva.
Some U.S.-based Nigerians,
concerned about the Yusuf's killing, sent a private petition
to the President earlier in the week calling for an
investigation.
Dr. Baba Adam, chairman of
U.S.-PRONACO, said in an e-mail sent on Monday to several
top Federal Government officials, including ministers and
special advisers to the president, that "we are speaking up
as friends of Armada Administration. Sooner someone
intervenes - the better - It is high time anyone who
knowingly broke the law should be held accountable, if not
those killing in the name of the state are equally as worst
as the Haramites."
The following day in response to a
reporter's question, President Umaru Yar'Adua announced that
his National Security Adviser was already investigating the
matter.
In the same vein, the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, released a
statement expressing deep concerns.
"We are deeply concerned by reports
of violence and of the plight of civilians in the affected
states in Northern Nigeria, following the reported attacks
by the 'Boko Haram' sect. In particular, the High
Commissioner is concerned over reports of the killing of
civilians," she noted.
According to the statement, "the UN
High Commissioner recognises that the government faced a
major crisis, with fighting taking place right in the heart
of the state capitals.
She hopes, however, "that the
government makes every effort to achieve security with full
adherence to legality and respect for human rights."
She added: " Every effort should be
made to avoid unlawful killings, arbitrary arrest and
detention while calling upon the government of Nigeria to
fully investigate all incidents and hold those responsible
to account. "###
NIGER DELTA
FG Wants To Kill Me
- Asari
The Niger Delta Peoples Volunteer
Force (NDPVF), headed by Muijaheed Dokubo-Asari, has said
that it would not accept the amnesty proposal of the Federal
Government even as the group has raised alarm over alleged
plans by the government to kill its leader upon his return
from Germany, where he is said to be receiving medical
attention.
"We also have adequate information
that the Nigerian State has once more planned to arrest and
assassinate Dokubo-Asari on arrival from Germany under the
guise of armed robbery," the group said.
Meanwhile, true to his word,
President Umaru Yar'Adua on Friday at the Presidential Villa
personally received the first batch of Niger Delta militant
leaders led by Victor Ben Ebikabowei (General Boyloaf), who
have accepted the President's offer of amnesty.
Boyloaf is a factional leader of
the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND)
and used to command the Bayelsa State operations of the
militant group. He led 31 other militant leaders of his
faction to the Villa.
During the 25-minute ceremony,
Yar'Adua commended the militant leaders for their patriotism
and courage evident in their decision to embrace the amnesty
offer for peace and stability to reign in the Niger Delta.
According to him: "It is not a
small feat; it is a very courageous act on your part. And
again, I want to thank you and commend you for displaying
this extraordinary courage, for displaying this patriotic
zeal for the people of the Niger Delta states and for the
nation in general.
"Issues that have given rise to
militancy itself, the agitation which culminated in having
an armed wing of the agitation, we will collectively look at
them and find ways to salvage them in such a way that
everybody throughout the country will be satisfied with what
solutions we come up with.
"Also, we must take note that once
this is done, development in the region will be rapid but it
will not be overnight."
He lamented that "it is
disheartening to see that young, energetic, intelligent
Nigerians are spending their lives in the creeks, which is
not allowed for any Nigerian. No Nigerian leader will wish
to see any Nigeria living that kind of life.
"I think it is high time we gave
the opportunity to our teeming youths in the Niger Delta
states that are in the creeks to come out to be
rehabilitated, live a normal life like any other person in
this country and have the opportunity that any other person
in this country has.
"I have confidence that we have
youths who are energetic, who can contribute to nation
building, who will contribute to humanity, who have great
support in seeking the peace and security in this region."
As he called on other militants to
emulate Boyloaf, the President directed the Chairman of the
Amnesty Panel and Minister of Defence, Godwin Abbe, to
continue liaison with the militants and work out logistics
on how to get them surrender their arms and benefit from
other amnesty largesse.
That is even as the NDPVF denied
reports in the media that Dokubo-Asari had returned a large
cache of arms to the government in the spirit of the
amnesty.
Dokubo-Asari's spokesman, Rex
Anighoro, who made the disclosure in a statement in Warri,
said it was agreed that members could accept the
government's olive branch out of their own volition.
He said: "It must be clearly stated
that at our well published General Assembly held on
Saturday, July 11, 2009 at Golf Prince Hotel, Port Harcourt
part of our resolution was, and is that the People Salvation
Front cum Niger Delta Peoples Volunteer Force (PSF/NDPVF)
will never accept amnesty. This resolution was a product of
a clear and well-articulated debate. However, in
accommodating minority opinion, we made it pellucid that any
member of our movement interested in taking amnesty is very
free to do so.
"We are convinced beyond reasonable
doubt that Dappa Dappaiye and Kingsley Solomon may have
taken this option and we are not against that. We are so
confident that since Alhaji communicates directly through
the office of the Secretary General and the Spokesman and
since he is in Germany he may not be in the know. Up to this
moment Dappa Dappaiye and Kingsley Solomon are still people
we have links to and we can never deny them."
He stated that both Dappa Dapaiye
and Kingsley Solomon arrested over alleged criminality were
bona fide members of the PSF, and denounced claims by Prince
Wisdom Amachree that he is the second-in-command to Asari,
"as our movement is a people movement with no such
structure."
He implored the government not to
kill them as any attempt to harm or kill them would paint
the amnesty in bad light.
Bayelsa State Governor, Timipre
Sylva, who facilitated the acceptance of amnesty by the
Boyloaf group, said in Abuja on Friday that his magic wand
was his ability to inspire trust and confidence to conquer
the skepticism and anxiety of the militants.
Espousing his strategy of triple E
-Empowerment, Engagement and Enforcement of Law - the
Governor said the release of MEND leader, Henry Okah, gave a
boost to his efforts, aside the fact that the militants
themselves wanted the amnesty but were not sure of
government's seriousness.
"They needed assurances and they
felt they could trust me. What I have done is to give them
confidence. Amnesty is also their idea, they wanted it. I
only opted to put myself forward with assurances of safety.
They have now left a life of uncertainty to that of
certainty.
"I know they are very serious about
returning their arms. They will keep their word and not
return to fighting in the creeks."###
N15 Billion Fraud: Transcorp Official to Remain In Kuje
Prison
After spending 71 days in Kuje
prison,the hope of a temporary freedom for Mike Okoli, the
suspended company secretary of Transnational Corporation (TRANSCORP)
Plc was dashed on Wednesday August 5, 2009 when a Federal
High Court, Maitama, Abuja dismissed his application for
variation of his bail condition.
Okoli was first arraigned by the
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on May 27,
2009 alongside Thomas Iseghohi, Group Managing Director and
Muhammed Buba, Deputy General Manager of TRANSCOP Plc on a
32 count charge of criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of
trust, money laundering and misappropriation of public funds
to the tune of N15 billion.
The accused subsequently filed
application for bail, a move that was vehemently opposed by
the prosecuting counsel. The trial judge, Justice Anuli
Chikere however granted them bail on June 22 on stringent
terms which include:
* A bond of N500 million each
* Accused persons to produce surety
in like sum.
* Sureties must be civil servants
with either a federal ministry, parastatal and must
produce evidence of appointment;
* Sureties must be owners of landed
property in Abuja with evidence of ownership from Abuja
Geographic Information System (AGIS);
* Sureties must show evidence of
tax clearance for three years from the Federal Inland
Revenue Service (FIRS);
* Each accused must deposit his
international passport in the court registry.
While Iseghohi and Buba were able
to meet their bail conditions, Okoli has found it tough
meeting the conditions. As a result, he approached the court
through his counsel, Joe Gadzama, SAN to seek for a
variation of his bail terms.
While pleading with the court to
vary the bail condition, Gadzama said it took the two other
accused persons, almost a month to meet the conditions.
"Staying behind bar is not easy and he cannot deliberately
say he could not meet the conditions. The 3rd accused person
has a seven year old child to take care of. He does not have
a surety who has landed property in Central Area and cannot
get a civil servant who can guarantee a N500 million," he
pleaded.
But delivering her ruling on the
application on Wednesday, Justice Anuli Chikere dismissed
the application as she noted that two of the accused persons
had already met the conditions for bail. "If the two are
able to meet the conditions, there is no reason why the
third accused cannot do so," she said.###
Freedom of Information Law Will Help Curb Corruption –
Waziri
Executive Chairman of the Economic
and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Mrs Farida Waziri has
said that the Freedom of Information (FOI) bill presently
before the National Assembly will boost the fight against
corruption and other forms of economic crimes in Nigeria
when eventually passed into law.
The anti-graft agency boss
disclosed this in a paper she presented at the first annual
forum of serving and retired permanent secretaries which
ended at the weekend in Abuja. 'There needs to be in place a
conscientious system for the gathering and dissemination of
information and this is linked to societal values. The press
must castigate the villains and praise the heroes. It is
through such activities that people will appreciate that it
pays to have integrity. To this extent, a freedom of
information legislation coupled with investigative reporting
could be helpful. These will also engender a culture of
freedom of speech which is a constitutional guarantee but in
practice hardly utilised.
The freedom of information bill
could tremendously help the process', Waziri argued while
speaking on 'Maintaining Personal and Institutional
Integrity in the Public Service' at a session chaired by Dr
Christopher Kolade, a former Nigerian High Commissioner to
the United Kingdom. She stated that for any anti-corruption
initiative to succeed in any society, certain structures and
specific pillars of integrity such as political will,
effective law enforcement, judiciary, legislation, media,
civil society must be present and functional.
According to her, 'where any of
these are not functional, then there will be a problem and
there is no incentive for anyone to have integrity. If the
law enforcement agencies are working at full throttle but
the judiciary is not effective, the criminal will simply
ambush the process at the doors of the judiciary and get
away. Conversely, there must be the political will to
squarely address the problems and the legislature must
intervene with remedial laws whenever it is necessary. Of
course, the media and effective civil society groups must
serve as dispassionate watchdogs of the system.’
She argued that it is only when the
needed structures are in place and are functional that acts
of corruption will be effectively discouraged and integrity
rewarded. 'This has been the plank from which the EFCC has
consistently insisted that the missing piece in the jig-saw
puzzle in the fight against corruption is the establishment
of a special court to try all cases of corruption and other
forms of economic crimes. Time without number, the
Commission has gone through the whole process of
investigating crimes only for the process to be stultified
in the courts of law for unnecessarily periods of time', the
EFCC Chairman added.
She urged all public office holders
to follow the exemplary leadership style of President Umar
Musa Yar'Adua by working to enthrone personal and
institutional integrity in any office they find
themselves.###
NEWS
ICT Certification Now A Must For RSUST Students
By Ngozi Anosike
The Senate of Rivers State
University of Science and Technology (RSUST) has made it
compulsory for all students to have on graduation ICT
certification irrespective of their course of study.
The Vice Chancellor of the
University, Prof. Barineme B. Fakae disclosed this in a
parley with media executives in Port Harcourt.
He noted that the course which is
meant to be offered by students at their convenient time
within their period of study is to make them more viable in
the labour market.
Chronicling the gains of ICT, he
said the school embraced it to ensure orderliness thereby
preventing chaotic situations, pointing out that there are
no more stories with regard to students' results and
admission procedures as all these are now done on-line.
On the issue of e-examinations, the
State owned University boss described it as one of the
off-shoots of e-learning which is a new order in education
all over the world.
Prof Fakae said it is necessary for
the school that is to develop into a world class institution
which according to him necessitated the need for every staff
and student of the school to be trained on the use of
computer free of charge hence the introduction of “learn
computer by the use of computer” for all.
He however maintained that the
e-process embarked by the school for its admission procedure
which was discredited in some quarters including the ASUU
chapter of the institution is not only cost effective but
most suitable in providing the speed, dexterity and
accountability required to select only 3,000 out of over
14,000 candidates for admission.
Prof. Fakae regretted that the
reform which has improved service delivery, removed
credibility problems while making the institution more
standardized has been resented by the lazy ones and those
who specialize in mutilation of results as this has already
led to the sack of one of the lecturers by the Senate.
Poised to vigorously pursue his
mandate in the institution that has a total of 22,366
students, the Vice Chancellor called for commitment on the
side of the staff and urged them to be “innovative bound
rather than rule bound”. ###
Ken Khana Traditional Rulers Council Dissolved …Gbenemene
Calls For Support
The Ken-Khana Council of
Traditional Rulers, an umbrella body of all Chiefs in
Ken-Khana Kingdom, Khana Local Government Area of Rivers
State, has been dissolved.
The Gbenemene Ken-Khana, His
Majesty, King (Dr.) M.S.H Eguru, Gbara II, who announced the
dissolution over the weekend, said the decision was taken
following lack of focus, ineffectiveness and gross abuse of
office on the part of officers of the dissolved council.
According to His Majesty King
Eguru, two thirds majority of members voted against the
former executive council, hence the dissolution.
The Gbenemene Ken-Khana also
disclosed that the dissolved executive had in their
possession a constitution of the body, which has not been
approved.
While thanking the dissolved Exco
for accepting to serve, he urged them to hand over all
properties of the Ken-Khana Council of Traditional Rulers in
their possession to the Acting Secretary, Ken-Khana Council
of Traditional Rulers, Chief D. F. Nwidag.
His Majesty, King Eguru solicited
the support of all members towards the building of a strong
and united Ken-Khana Council of Chiefs for the benefit of
all.
Meanwhile, a nine man caretaker
committee headed by His Majesty, King M.S.H Eguru has been
inaugurated.
Others are Chief D. F. Nwidag, Bua
Baen, Acting Secretary, while Chief Ike Dimkpa, Bua Baen,
Chief Godpower Nwibani, Bua Bom, Chief Konee Nae, Bua Bom,
Chief Madu Deeyor, Bua Kenwigbara, Chief Monday Dugbor, Bua
Kenwigbara, Chief Leyira Nwinam, Bua Yaasere and Chief
Benson Deezia, Bua Yaasere are to serve as members.###
Rivpoly Rector Proffers Hard Work As Panacea For Gender
Barrier
Women in technical education in the
country have been called upon to break gender barriers and
make their impact felt in the practice of science and
technology.
The Ag. Rector of the Rivers State
Polytechnic, Bori, Prof. T. G. Sokari, made the call when
the Rivpoly Chapter of Women in Technical Education (WITED)
paid him a courtesy call in his office.
Prof. Sokari said that any woman,
with a high sense of commitment and hard work, could excel
like her male counterparts, in any chosen profession, and
urged women in technical education to face the challenges of
the profession as they would be given every necessary
support and encouragement.
He noted that the management of the
Polytechnic has always encouraged women to ascend to exalted
positions in the Polytechnic and pledged the continued
support of his administration to enable WITED achieve set
objectives.
Earlier in her briefing, the
co-coordinator of Rivpoly Chapter of WITED, Mrs. Charity
Kpabep, who is also a lecturer in the department of
mechanical engineering of the Polytechnic, had said that it
became necessary to introduce WITED which was recently
formed in the polytechnic, to the management of the
institution, and used the opportunity to solicit for support
towards the formal inauguration of WITED in the Polytechnic
###
NEWS BRIEF
Suspected Militants Kidnap Ndoni Citizen
By Polycarp Nwaeke
Chukwudi Odili, an indigene of
Ndoni in Ogba-Egbema Local Government Council of Rivers was
on Sunday 2nd August, at about 9:30pm abducted near a
popular suya spot at Rumuodara by three uniformed men
suspected to be militants.
According to an eye-witness who
watched the drama played out, few minutes after a man parked
his ash colour Infiniti Jeep and went to buy suya at a
nearby suya spot, a red Honda car bearing Imo State Plate
Number surfaced immediately and parked close to the jeep.
Three men in army uniform had come out of the car, leaving
the fourth person, the driver on the steering. They had
distributed themselves around where the jeep was parked. The
moment they did that, their driver zoomed off with the red
Honda car. As the man came out from the suya spot and
entered his car, the three uniformed men emerged from their
hiding places pounced on, and threatened him with their
guns. They dragged him out from the steering and put him at
the back seat of the jeep. Having successfully done that,
two of the suspected gunmen barricaded him at the back seat,
while the third one went into the front seat and drove the
car away.
Narrating further, the eye-witness
said he was sure that the kidnappers had been trailing their
victim, until he was finally way laid at the Rumuodara suya
spot so easily.
The eyewitness said he made
enquiries and found out that the kidnapped man is a relation
of former Governor Peter Odili, insisting that he is a
lawyer and lives at Rumunduru, off Eneka Road. Other
eyewitnesses interviewed corroborated his claims.
When contacted, the DPO of Okporo
Division of the Nigeria Police confirmed the kidnap incident
and gave the names of the kidnapped man as Chukwudi Odili,
an indigene of Ndoni in Ogba/Egbema Local Government Area of
Rivers State. He however said, he did not know if he is
related to former Governor Odili, insisting that many people
from that area bear the name, Odili. He also told National
Network that the man's Infiniti Jeep had been located some
where at Owerri, in Imo State. He equally spoke of the
concerted efforts his division made in relaying information
across to police check-points and departments concerning the
incident while directing further enquires to CIB section of
the Nigeria police at Moscow Road, Port Harcourt###
Commissioner Shuns Parents Of Collapsed Rivers Malaysia’s
Student
The woes of Rivers State students
studying in Malaysia are increasing by the day as one of
them has reportedly collapsed as a result of hunger
occasioned by the inability of the government to remit their
allowances to them.
However, despite the sorry
situation of the students, some of their parents who went to
intimate the commissioner of education with the latest
development (the collapse of the student) were reportedly
not allowed to see her.
The students were said to have
earlier called the commissioner but the person who answered
their call allegedly told them that the commissioner had
traveled to Europe.
Information indicated however, that
the commissioner did not travel but was shying away from
visiting Malaysia to answer the call of the university
authorities on why her ministry has elected to suffer Rivers
students there by not paying their allowances promptly.
The woman is said to be afraid of
going to meet the students who she allegedly described as
very rough, having heard how they treated the former
permanent secretary in the ministry, who once visited them
during this kind of a situation.
Now, with no allowance and having
not paid their tuition fees for two months, some of the
students are said to be considering going for diploma
courses instead of coming home with nothing.
The students are surprised that the
terrible situation has not moved the commissioner, who
instead of bringing succour, has elected to terminate the
consultancy services they have been making use of, in
Malaysia.
Heavily in debt and without money
to buy food, the students have made a passionate appeal to
governor Amaechi to come to their aid very quickly as the
situation may get worst###.
NEWS
Ngo Community, Councilors Laud Council's Electricity Project
Commercial activities in major
markets in Ngo Community, headquarters of Andoni Local
Government Council were temporarily stalled penultimate
Saturday in glee of the arrival of electrical equipment in
the community, which sparked off jubilation among residents
of the area.
The celebration, which attracted
both young and old along major roads in Ngo town was in
anticipation of likely end to the protracted power outage in
the community when installation of the equipment is
completed.
The equipment include three high
capacity transformers and electric poles that were provided
by the two month old administration of Madam Emilia Gilbert
Nte, Acting Chairman of the Local Government Council to
restore power supply to the people after over four decades
of power outage in the area.
Besides, serving members of the
legislative arm of the council have also lent their voice in
praise for the performance of the council chairman, saying
that they see in her the vision to transform the area.
Speaking with newsmen at the
council secretariat, Ngo, the leader of the legislative
council in the area, Hon. Awajimimam Alafonye Uriah said the
delivery of the electricity project one month after the
assumption of office of the administration was a clear
manifestation of the visionary leadership of the Acting
Chairman.
He assured the people of his
councilors support to encourage her create positive impact
of the government in the council headquarters and the
various communities of their representation.
Also in his own reaction, the House
Chief Whip, Hon. Gogoteh Lazarus Nteoguile said the project
is significant in the life of the people due to its
socio-economic importance, stressing that it would encourage
visitors and commercial activities in Ngo, the council
headquarters.
The execution of the project was in
fulfillment of the Acting Chairman's earlier promise on
assumption of office two months ago to restore power supply
in the headquarters of council, among other meaningful
development projects that would have direct bearing on the
lives of the people.
The new transformers are to
complement the existing five which the administration is
also currently undertaking repair works to recover them from
their bad state in order to step up the capacity required to
generate power supply for the people.
The project, when completed will
serve over seven communities, between Ngo and Agwut-Obolo
communities at this first start.
Meanwhile, a team of engineers has
been engaged on sites to ensure the installation of the
equipment for immediate take off of power supply for the
areas.
Addressing journalists amid
jubilation, Lawrence Ereferokuma (JP) Chairman of Ngo
Community Development Committee, CDC expressed satisfaction
for the provision of the electrical installation, saying
that Madam Nte has broken the jinx of non performance in the
council.
Ereferokuma, who is also the
Chairman of Andoni council of community development
committee (CDC) said the giant stride of the Acting
Chairman, development would be witnessed in the area.
“Today is a great day in the new
direction because what we have yearning for has come. And
because there is light today, there is hope for prosperity”.
Also in his speech, Prince Esukuile
Awajiogak Esukuile, the Secretary, Community Development
Committee (CDC) in Akradi Town in the LGA said “The CDC in
the entire Andoni, is happy because this is what we have
been crying for” adding that” if the State House of Assembly
wishes to help Andoni is to allow this woman, Hon. Emilia
Gilbert Nte to remain as our Chairman###.
NURTW Boss Denies Overcharging Drivers, Harbouring Criminals
By Gilbert Amadi
The Chairman of the National Union
of Road Transport Workers (NURTW) Rumuokoro, Motor park,
Chief Dr. S. O. Amadi has denied the allegation of
overcharging commuters using the park.
Also described as false and
mischievous is the allegation of using the motor park to
habour undesirable elements who have constituted a nuisance
in the area.
The NURTW helmsman, Chief S. O.
Amadi made these clarifications while briefing newsmen in
his office.
According to Chief Amadi, he and
his exco are only concerned with maintenance of order and
peace at the park as a result of which the services of
security personnel like the police and civil defence have
been employed to guard against insecurity.
On the allegation of extortion,
Chief Amadi said the park authority only charges N200.00 per
driver on daily basis which he said is used for the running
of the motor park which include salaries of those working
there, provision of security, environmental sanitation and
provision of conveniences etc. Apart from the N200.00 charge
for which receipt is issued, the Chairman said his exco was
not aware of any other charges.
He however added that the State
Ministry of Transport and the Local Government Council
(Obalga) collect the sums of N10,000.00 and N5,000.00
respectively from each driver on annual basis which is not
the business of the motor park authority. Chief Amadi
described those accusing his exco of extortion and
harbouring criminals as doing so in bad faith and advised
them to desist from such mischief forthwith.
The NURTW boss also used the
opportunity to extol the leadership qualities of the State
Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Amaechi, stressing that his
developmental strives have given meaning to the people's
lives.
Also given a pat on the back is the
Chairman of Obio/Akpor Local Government Council, Hon.
Timothy Nsirim who, Chief Amadi said has performed
creditably in the provision of democratic dividends to
Obio/Akpor.
He prayed both leaders to continue
in their effort to do their best for the Rivers people###.
Action Congress Chieftain Makes Peace With Council Boss
The problem between the Executive
Chairman of Khana Local Government Council, Bariledum Nwidam
and Comrade Sunny Bekanwah of Action Congress has been
discovered to be politically motivated.
Bekanwah alleged that being an
Action Congress member, the Council Chairman has been
accusing him of not supporting his administration and even
attempting to run it down.
He said for these reasons, the
Local Government Chairman who is a card-carrying PDP member
has been going about and telling people that he Sunny was
responsible for all the kidnapping that has been taking
place in Ogoniland.
Bekanwah said the Chairman openly
disclosed at the burial ceremony of Late Michael Nwikina
Kwawa that no other person except him has been responsible
for the kidnappings going on in Ogoniland.
It was for this reason that the
Action congress chieftain sue the chairman to court for
defamation, claiming the sum of N10 Million from him at the
Bori High Court 2.
He said people have come with the
intention of settling the two of them but that he had
vehemently refused until during the day of the presentation
of his book when the Chairman came to address the audience,
praising him that he decided to make peace with him.
This peace has begun to pay off as
Sunny has promised to bring his group to support Nwidam
administration and to campaign for him during the 2011
election###.
Rivers NULGE Is Intact – President
By Amadi Gilbert
Amidst reports of in- fighting and
factionalization of National Union of Local Government
Employee (NULGE) Rivers Chapter, its president, Apostle
Godwin Tumini Diri says the body is intact.
The clarification came on the heels
of the warning from the National President of the union,
comrade Prince Kingsley Ogba that the factional group led by
Dr. Ajie should withdrawa the suit it instituted against the
body before 13th August.
Diri who made this known during an
interactive session with journalists at the NULGE Consulate
Port Harcourt disclosed that there was no time Rivers NULGE
has not been in peace since 1998 it came into existence,
except of recent, when opposition led by Dr. Chibor Ajie
emerged from Akuku-Toru branch.
The president said in order to
maintain the legacy already left behind by the union, his
exco and branch chairmen during their last general meeting
canvassed for the possibility of making Barr. Francis Ajunwo
who has served the body meritoriously for eight years as
vice President, the next president. He said having worked
for eight years he has in-depth knowledge of the union and
so would continue to build it, as opposed to electing a
green-horn who will start learning the ropes.
He said Dr. Ajie, Akuku-Toru branch
president who has gone to court to seek redress could not
even deliver the workers of the LGA during the last
election, or improve their welfare and wondered why he is
scheming to be in top position.
However, Dr. Ajie said the exco
breached the constitution of the union by their campaign and
manner of presenting their manifestoes, adding that the
delegates for the coming election were hand picked,
stressing that it was those reasons that he went to court.
The election has since been
postponed by the National President, Comrade Prince Kingsley
Ogba###
Rotary Club:
Rtn Dieme Odom Is New President For P/H South-By Amadi Gilbert
Rtn Hamilton Dieme Odom is the new
President of Rotary Club of Port Harcourt South. Rotarian
Odom, an Estate Surveyor who was installed the new President
at the Delta Hotels, Port Harcourt recently replaces the
former President, Rtn Dr. F. S. Wokoma who led Port Harcourt
South branch of the International Club for year 2008/2009.
Addressing newsmen after his
installation, Rtn Hamilton D. Odom thanked his club mates
for considering him worthy for the exalted position. He
called on men and women of goodwill to join the club and
support the cause of humanity.
Lauding the vision and public
spirit behind the Rotary Club worldwide, Rtn Odom said what
was being witnessed was a mere formal hand over of
leadership, stressing that the Rotary Club has a well
defined means of electing new officers which is never in
doubt.
As he rounds off his tenure in
2010, he said a new president to take over from him has
already been elected in the person of Rtn Florence Appah.
According to Rtn Odom, the Rotary
Club which has been accorded a permanent observer status at
the United Nations will continue to pursue its humanitarian
objectives that have stood it out among all the other
international non-governmental organizations.
Anchoring his leadership on the
club's concern for child welfare, immunization against
polio, relief for refugees, rural development and world
peace, president Odom stressed on the need to provide
portable water to at least two communities that lack water
as a challenge to his administration.
“In the world today, there is so
much to do, problems to solve, many conflicts to settle,
many needy children to reach, much to do about polio
eradication. The harvest is indeed, plenty but the labourers
are few” he stated.
In his address, the immediate past
President, Rtn Dr. F. Wokoma said the main reasons for the
ceremony were to review the activities of the past exco,
formal installation and public presentation of the new club
president and to present and launch the community service
projects of the club for 2009/2010 Rotary year.
He also used the opportunity to
solicit support for the new Rotary President.
The highlight of the ceremony was
the conferment of awards and honours on some distinguished
personalities for their humanitarian services to the
society.
They include Hon. Collins
Chukwuemeka Ordu, member representing Obio/Akpor in the
Rivers State House of Assembly, Engr. Efobudu Nwenendah
Emessobi from Emohua, Mr. Iloye Braide from Delga, Duntonye
Joseph Olaileye from Kwawa State and Hon. Ms. Mediline
Tador, General Manager, Radio Rivers###.
Wokoma Raises Alarm Over Plot To Sell Co-Operative’s
Properties
…It's A Lie - Alasia
By Polycarp Nwaeke
Tubonimi Wokoma, the president of
Rivers Transport and Investment Co-Operative Union Ltd, has
raised alarm over alleged plan by Victor Alasia led
management of Co-operative Federation of Rivers State to
sell the organization's properties.
This is coming barely four years
after the former president, Martins Amabipi in conjunction
with his board members sold plot 126 Trans-Amadi, one of
choicest properties owned by Rivers Co-operative Federation
at a ridiculous price of Ninety Six Million naira (N96M) to
Schlumberger. The property which Wokoma estimated at Two
billion naira (N2 billion) is today the subject of
litigation between the co-operative Federation and
Schlumberge. Concerning that particular property, Victor
Alasia, the Federation's president, told National Network
that the Director of co-operative then and now, Mr Okere had
written an official letter to Amabipi, warning him and his
management not to sell that property as well as other
co-operative's properties. Amabipi management he said,
disregarded the warning and went ahead to sell the property,
stressing that, that was why his management deemed it
necessary to go to court to recover possession.
However, Wokoma alleged again that
the president has sold another of the co-operative's
property at Rumuosi at a cost of four million, five hundred
thousand naira (N4.5m) and misappropriated the money. Alasia
admitted that he sold the property but said the proceeds
were not mismanaged as it was recorded into the co-operative
account. He said everything he has done in the organization
so far, is documented, stressing that he was ready to give
account anytime, anyday.
Despite that the dusts generated by
the sale of these properties have not died down, Alasia is
said to have come up again with a brilliant idea that would
put money into his pocket. Wokoma said the president
recently came up with the idea of establishing a
micro-finance bank for the co-operative. To do this, Alasia
hinted to him that he was planning to mortgage another of
the union's property at number 131 Aggrey Road at a price of
thirty million naira (N30million).
Wokoma said the idea of trying to
raise thirty million naira (N30m) from the co-operative
property at Aggrey Road seemed like a huge joke to him.
This, according to him, was because the property there is so
small that no bank in its right sense will pay five million
naira (N5m) even as mortgage fee.
Few weeks after, Wokoma continued,
Alasia brought in estate valuers to value the co-operative
building at No 34 Ikwerre Road. It was then it dawned on him
that having realized that the property at Aggrey Road would
not fetch the required N30 million, Alasia may have decided
to use the Ikwerre Road Co-operative building as mortgage
for the thirty million naira (N30m) required for the
proposed micro-finance bank. This he said, could account for
why he brought the estate valuers to estimate the current
price of the property. Reacting, Alasia said this imputation
was not correct as his administration had made it a point of
duty to value the organisation's properties every year.
The Transport Department President
also requested to know what the Federation's president has
done with the rents he has been collecting from the
co-operative's properties. He equally asked questions
concerning the organisation's estimated ten million naira
(N10m) worth of shares in Sky Bank. He said he strongly
believed that the shares have been but and not accounted
for. “If the shares are still there, why shouldn't the
management look for how to sell them and with the money
realized from it coupled with the ones coming from rents
float the micro-finance bank?” Wokoma asked.
What embittered Wokoma was that
when he did all that the President never consulted the
co-operative members. He said since the past three years
Alasia took over from the former management, he has not held
AGM and wondered how he has been relating with other members
of the board and members of the organization. He said it was
this lapse that has embolden him to act arbitrarily most of
the time.
To this charge of not calling
Annual General meetings (AGM), the Rivers Co-operative
president said he was first of all trying to put the
organization on a sound footing, having been left in
disarray by the administration of Amabipi. He said the
moment he is through with what his management was planning
to make the co-operative viable, AGM will start holding.
Amidst all these allegations,
Wokoma called on the State government, in particular, the
Commerce and Industry Commissioner, Ogbonna Nwuke to look
for a way of salvaging Rivers Co-operative Federation,
saying it is a legacy their forefathers bequeathed to them
and so should not be allowed to die.
When contacted, the President of
the Rivers Co-operative Federation, Victor Alasia denied the
allegations, saying what ever he was doing is in the
interest of the organization. He said when the time comes he
will present documents to prove his accusers wrong.##
NEWS
Andoni Indigenes Drag TOTALFINA,
ELF, Two Others To Court … Demand Change of Name, N700
Billion Compensation
Indigenes of Andoni (Obolo) ethnic
nationality in the oil-rich Rivers State, under the aegis of
Andoni Supreme Youth Congress (ASYC), have dragged three
multinational crude oil and gas companies to court over a
contentious oil field.
The three major multi-national
hydro-carbon, crude oil and gas producers in the suit are
Total E & P Nigeria Limited, Mobil Producing Nigeria
Unlimited and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation
(NNPC).
In a suit with No. BHC/84/2009, the
Andonis are asking the court to declare against the oil
conglomerates that the huge Amenam/Kpono oil field jointly
operated by the defendants situates in the Andoni local
council area territory in Rivers State and not Akwa-Ibom
State.
The youths are also praying the
court to order the three defendants to change the name of
the oil field in contention from "Amenam/Kpono" oil field to
"Andoni" oil field.
The suit, which was instituted by
Deacon Peter Timothy and three others, for themselves and as
representing the Andoni Supreme Youth Congress (ASYC),
further seeks an order directing the oil companies to pay
Andoni communities the sum ofN700 billion as special and
general damages.
According to the claimants, since
the commencement of the defendants' operational activities
at the Amenam/Kpono offshore oil field, about six years ago,
till date, the companies had wrongfully paid all the
compensations, homage, royalties and other entitlements that
accrued and are still accruing to Andoni communities in
Rivers State to communities in Akwa-Ibom State.
They further averred in their
30-paragraph statement of claim that Andoni communities in
Rivers State are the people entitled to payment of adequate
and Commensurate compensations, royalties and other
accruable benefits being the defendants' host communities
with regard to the massive Amenam/Kpono oil field.
Meanwhile, a date has not yet been
fixed for the hearing of what promises to be an epic
offshore oil field case which was filed at the Bori High
Court recently.##
NEWS
Brick House: Twist In Guber Tussle
…As Rivers People Take Case To
Yar'Adua, NJC, AGF, CJN ... Query Justice Kastina-Alu, JSC
Trouble seems to be blowing anew in
the Treasure Base of Nigeria as some Rivers Citizens have
regrouped to petition the president, Alhaji Umaru Musa
Yar'Adua, the National Judicial Council, the Chief Justice
of Nigeria, the president of the Court of Appeal, Justice
Umaru Abdullahi and the Attorney General of the Federation,
Mr. Michael Kaase Aondoaka. Their grouse is sited on the
legal jiggery pockery that has attended the election
petition case between Governor Rotimi Amaechi and Chief
Bekinbo Soberekon currently at the Court of Appeal sitting
in Port Harcourt.
According to our sources, these
aggrieved citizens of Rivers State are uncomfortable with
the way and manner the Supreme Court which according to them
led by Justice A.I. Katsina-Alu and Justice C.M.
Chukwuma-Eneh now twist the arm of the law, the constitution
and Equity to ensure that Rotimi Amaechi-led undemocratic
and unelected government prevails over good sense.
This group which is fearlessly led
by Emenike Chinda as chairman and Datubo Kalada as secretary
under the aegis of National Movement for Equity and Justice
(NMEJ) chronicles Judicial precedents and plethora of legal
authorities to fault the actions of these Supreme Court
wisemen in the enterprice.
The group insists that the Supreme
Court decision of 25th October, 2007 delivered by Justice
A.I. Katisna-Alu which declared Amaechi as Rivers Governor
was a travesty of Justice as according to them, Amaechi
never contested any Guber election and as such did not
satisfy the conditions stipulated by the Constitution for
him to be a legitimate Governor.
The group also wondered why it is
the same Justice A. I. Katsina-Alu that decides to always
offer himself as a succour and last resort to every
Constitutional kwashiorkor of Amaechi.
According to them, section 246(3)
of the 1999, constitution says that the decision of the
Court of Appeal in respect of appeals arising from election
petitions shall be final and that it was a clear abuse of
court process to assume jurisdiction or to attempt to hear
the appeal brought by Amaechi.
The duo queried the rationale
behind the four months adjournment at the Supreme Court in
Amaechi's case from June 2nd to 8th October, 2009 which was
done by Justice A. I. Katsina-Alu and his penchant to
perpetuate Amaechi in office inspite of the questionability
of his tenure and declaration as governor.
The group therefore draws the
attention of President Yar'Adua who rings bell as rule of
law president to call the affected Justices of the Supreme
Court to order advising them to do justice and not to twist
it for what ever reason. They also called on the Attorney
General of the Federation, Mr Michael Aondoaka, the National
Justicial Council whose duty it is to recommend who becomes
Justices of the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice of the
Nigeria, Justice Idris Legbo Kutigi, the President of the
Court of Appeal and Justice Umaru Abdullahi to intervene and
save the Rivers masses from the horror of undemocratism and
twisted Justice now imminent at the Supreme Court copiously
being abated by Justice A. I. Katsina-Alu and co.
The group continues to ponder on
what exactly could be the interest of the said Justice of
the Supreme court in Rivers politics and the rationale
behind using only Katsina-Alu to always adjudicate over the
Rivers political legal battle at the Supreme Court, “Why
must it be Katsina-Alu?” they queried. “And why is it that
each time Katsina-Alu makes legal pronouncement on the issue
it is always the controversial and constitutionally
illogical pronouncements that aches Rivers people and indeed
legal minded Nigerians? These according to the group now
needs a judicial satellite if the Supreme Court should still
earn the respect of the Riversman.
Some legal questions raised by the
group include but not limited to;
1. Why is the Supreme Court
entertaining Amaechi's question of its made on a clearly
pre-election matter, though delivered as a post election
judgment question.
2. Notwithstanding the
constitutional or frivolous or extremely important legal
questions Amaechi may want the Supreme Court to answer,
according to section 246(3) of the constitution can that
procedure vitiate the provisions of the Nigeria constitution
and/or ever be used in the final decisions of the court of
Appeal in respect of the guber election?
3. Has the Court of Appeal
not made its Ruling and is it not the conclusive
pronouncement, on the substitution Amaechi is seeking the
Supreme Court to upturn or determining his lawful
installation as Governor? Is the Court of Appeal not final
Court with respect to Guber Electoral Matters?
4. Is Amaechi not
estoppelled on the matter of substitution, likewise the
Supreme Court?
5. Why is the Supreme Court
seemingly hungry for jurisdiction or struggling with the
Court of Appeal for jurisdiction and thus allowing Amaechi
to foist a situation of helplessness upon itself by
entertaining what it did not tolerate in previous cases
before it and had scolded senior lawyers who assisted
politicians so to do?
In the mean, for those who thought
that the political legal unrest has been whittled away by
Amaechi's policy of road construction, the tense atmosphere
posed by these questions and petition of this group proves
them wrong. But will their petition bring justice?###
Rumuokwurusi Town Council Election: Forum Refutes Alleged
Statement On Zoning… The Publication Is Malicious -
High Chief Amadi
Concerned citizens of Rumuwokerebe,
Rumuokwurusi in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers
State has described as false, malicious, baseless and a
calculated attempt to create bad blood in the community a
statement credited to Hon. Ebere Achor, former Vice Chairman
of Obalga and the current Secretary of Rumuwokerebe
Community Council in Surveillance newspaper of August 3-10,
2009, Vol/10-15, page 2 on the forthcoming Rumuokwurusi Town
Council election.
Hon. Anchor, a highly respected
community leader and erudite scholar has also denied ever
making any statement or contribution that had to do with a
call for zoning in the forthcoming election as erroneously
contained in the Surveillance newspaper.
Also peeved and angry over the
publication is a concerned citizen of Rumuwokerebe and
convener of the forum, High Chief Okechukwu J. Amadi.
Chief Amadi who feels highly
embarrassed by the brazen misrepresentation of the intention
of the forum and facts highlighted at the meeting said it
was very unfortunate that the mischievous publication was
coming at a time the people of Rumuwokerebe are fighting for
a common goal.
“From our point of view, the
intention of the writer of that publication is to cause
disaffection among the members of the newly created forum
who are doubtlessly veritable partners in progress. For
avoidance of doubt, I wish to categorically state that Hon.
John Achor did not author any suggestion on zoning”, High
Chief O. J. Amadi declared.
According to High Chief Amadi, Hon.
J. E. Achor, one of the elites in Rumuwokerebe Community
clearly understands and appreciates the myriad of challenges
confronting the progress of the community and moreso is
literate enough to know his contributions in a gathering of
such significance.
High Chief Amadi therefore enjoined
the reading public to discountenance the report as published
in Surveillance newspaper as it did not represent the
discussions and facts raised at the meeting###.
Eneka Old Students Association Appoints New Members Into BOT
The Eneka Old Students Association
(E.O.S.A) has appointed new members into its Board of
Trustees (BOT) with a view to boosting the corporate image
and improving the welfare of the association.
At its emergency general meeting
held on Saturday, August 1, 2009 at Rumuobiakani Town Hall,
the following persons were appointed into the exalted
position of Trustees of the Board:
High Chief Okechukwu J. Amadi-
Chairman, Mr. Collins Orji Secretary, Prince Henry Ihunda
Member, Barr. Worgu Boms, Member and Princess Ure Ejims,
Member.
Responding, the chairman of Eneka
Old Students Association, Comrade Kennedy Ogbondah expressed
joy and appreciation over the calibre of persons appointed
to serve as Board of Trustees (BOT). He went further to say
that the formation of the Board of Trustees, would
facilitate the registration of this noble association with
the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC).
Among the notable products of Eneka
Secondary School is the Chief of Staff, Government House,
Port Harcourt, Barr. Nyesom Wike, Dr. Okechukwu Onuchukwu,
Head, Department of Economics, University of Port Harcourt
Chief Nnamdi Wokekoro, Chairman Rivers State Environmental
Sanitation Authority, Barr. Worgu Boms and many other
important personalities that have excelled and distinguished
themselves in various areas of human endeavour.
Responding, the chairman, Board of
Trustees, High Chief Okechukwu J. Amadi thanked the
Association for the honour done him and his board members.
He enjoined all the members to be in attendance at the next
meeting slated to hold on August 29, 2009 at Rumuobiokani
Town Hall by 4:pm.###
Public Notice
CONCERNED CITIZENS Of Rumuwokerebe
Communiqué:
At the meeting of CCR held on
Saturday, August 1, 2009 at the palace of High Chief
Okechukwu Amadi, the following resolutions were taken:
* CCR Commended the people of
Rumuokwurusi town for adopting zoning system for selecting
executive officers for RTC and RYM.
* That since some elective offices
have been zoned to Rumuwokerebe, all hands must be on deck
to ensure that we present credible candidates for the
election.
* That during the electioneering
period, nobody from Rumuwokerebe should carry out any
campaign of calumny against any person running for the
election.
*That all family chairmen in
Rumuwokerebe should be invited to the next meeting.
* That chieftaincy issues
should not be discussed in the CCR Forum.
* That all sons and
daughters of Rumuwokerebe should be concerned with, and
bring suggestions on how peace can return to Rumuwokerebe.
Signed:
High Chief Okechukwu Amadi
Chairman
Esotericist Monday Wehere
JP, FCE, FNCIPA, CPA
Secretary
ISSUE
Residents Groan Under Amaechi’s Bulldozers
The first title I conceived for
this piece was 'Amaechi, the Excavator' and it was inspired
by the destruction and excavation of offices, homes and
roads for the restoration of the garden city status of Port
Harcourt, the capital city of Rivers State and the
unofficial headquarters of the Niger Delta. I had a rethink
because it came out negative and sounded to me like
professional criticism.
Governor Amaechi clearly has good
intentions for his State but good intentions can midwife bad
projects and can also produce bad results in as much the
same way as bad intentions. This is the lesson of history.
But besides the teachings of history, it is dangerous to
trust a ruler whose rulership is traceable more to a court
of law than the will of the people. I mean this to come out
as a fact the people of Rivers State have to live with, not
necessarily as a 'yabis' of the Governor. Another reason for
which we must pay attention to the unfolding agenda of the
Governor is that he has been 'blessed' with a docile House
of Assembly whose members are more concerned with
politicking than the pursuit of their constitutional
functions. He is, in this regard, as fortunate as his
predecessor, Governor Peter Odili.
Now the excavations: Governor
Amaechi has excavated most of the artery roads that connect
the suburbs to the major roads. The people are told he has
advised to do so by a committee he put together soon after
he was sworn into office. They are reported to have given
two reasons for their advice: solving the impossible traffic
situation and beautifying the city. The inordinately few
professionals on the committee we have spoken to; say that
the Governor disregarded the core of the advice he was
given. What we know now is that Governor Amaechi has
destroyed more than four hundred offices and homes to
actualize his beautification plan. We have no sympathy with
office and home owners who breached the rules of government
but we are outraged by the destruction of valuable property
to actualize a beautification agenda more so because the
goals could have been achieved by other methods. We are also
outraged by the destruction of public facilities: like the
former General Hospital on Hospital Road, returned to the
State government by the University of Port Harcourt which
had used the facility temporarily for its teaching hospital
requirements. Promising the people a mega hospital he had
shelved now for soil content reasons. Governor Amaechi had
the facility destroyed. The soil tests should have preceded
the destruction. For his mistake, if it truly was a mistake,
the people of River, State, have been denied the use of a
medical facility that was conceived and constructed with
pains years before the Governor was born.
Like the general hospital, the
Rivers State government, has excavated roads like the
Oginigba, Trans Amadi Road, the Mgbuoba/NTA/Choba Road, the
Rumuomasi/Rumuobiakani/Old Aba Road, Rumuola/Rumuokwuta link
road, all functioning before the excavation exercise. The
government has however failed to repair roads in need, roads
like the Ada George/Rumuepirikom Road, Stadium Road, Abuloma
Road: uncompleted projects that were inherited are also
casualties of this Government as they have remained
uncompleted. Another feature this Government should win
awards for is its slowness in completing, projects. From the
time this Government was sworn in it has not completed one
road project it started. Of course, excluded from this are
roads that were patched up by the road rehabilitation
committee that Governor Amaechi put together soon after his
swearing in. All the roads under re-construction have been
perpetually abandoned. The wide and deep gullies created by
the excavations on the Shell/Rumuobiakani/Old Aba Road have
been left unattended, except for mosquito larvae, for more
than four months.
Enter the human casualties. Men and
women whose properties have been sacrificed for Gov
Amaechi's beautification project have died of hypertension
and cardiac attacks, bringing into question the final
intentions of this Government. Homes and offices have been
destroyed on roads the Governor has no intention of
widening. Most importantly however, not much has been
achieved by way of beautification for all our trouble. The
traffic situations are getting worse and the former garden
city looks more like a rubble city than anything else.
Traffic situations are caused more
by the concentration of housing projects and public
facilities than by the narrowness of roads. In old Lisbon,
most of the inner city roads are one lane roads. Instead of
destroying, ancient architectural masterpieces. the
Portuguese Government simply opened up new cities. Cascais,
Carcavelos and Estoril all around and beside the old city,
relocating key ministries and facilities that attracted
citizens to the old city. Governor Amaechi should have
stayed with his Greater Port Harcourt project and should
pursue it with more haste and wisdom than he has applied to
other projects. It is simply immoral to first render people
homeless and out of business before conceiving ideas to
resettle them into homes and shops. That brings me to the
contentious Port Harcourt waterfronts question. The
Government proposes to destroy the waterfronts dwellings
where the Ijaw people of Rivers State and their cousins from
other states prefer to live. The official reasons proffered
by Government do not in my humble opinion suffice to render
about 1 million people homeless. If Government had had the
sense to build alternative dwellings, the people would feel
less hostile about the plan. If Government destroys their
homes first before thinking up alternative it would have
disqualified itself from being a viable Government as the
primary responsibility of government is to provide safety
and security for its people.###
ADVERTORIAL
NATIONAL MOVEMENT FOR EQUITY & JUSTICE (NMEJ)
Rivers State Chapter
17 Ekuku Street, Off Ebony Road, Orazi, Port Harcourt
e-mail: nmejphc@gmail.com Tel: +2347063718976
Invitation of A State of Anomy & Anarchy in Rivers State, is
Supreme Court “Hungry”
For Jurisdiction Over Court of Appeal's Final Decision On
Guber Election?
Your Lordship,
We have simplified and chronicled
in this piece, the facts of the Rivers State Governorship
Election of April 14th 2007 as follows:
1.In the Supreme Court Judgment of
25th October, 2007 the Supreme Court (panel headed by
Justice A.I. Katsina-Alu, JSC) had ordered Rt. Hon. Rotimi
Amaechi into office as Governor of Rivers State (Amaechi
himself not having been voted for in the elections but being
the sole beneficiary of the judicial 'benevolence' of the
Supreme Court);
2. On the strength of that
Supreme Court Judgment (and for all intents and purposes)
Barr Celestine Omehia was lawfully, physically and
unquestionably replaced, and substituted by Rt. Hon. Rotimi
Amaechi;
3. Promptly after the
Rivers State Governorship Election, several candidates of
other parties challenged both the conduct of the Guber
Elections and the original Supreme Court Judgment of 25th
October, 2007 which candidates for the purposes of this
discussion are limited to (1.) Chief Bekinbo Soberekon
(Accord Party's guber candidate) who challenged the conduct
of the elections (right up to the Court of Appeal
(Tribunal), and (2.) Barr. Kelechi Onyekwere (PPA guber
candidate) and Dr. Abiye Sekibo (former Minister for
Transport, former PDP guber aspirant) both of who challenged
the Supreme Court Judgment (right up to the Supreme Court
again):
4. On the 26th day of
November, 2008, the Judges of the Court of Appeal (Tribunal)
unanimously ruled to the effect that: (1.) Amaechi's
substitution of Omehia is automatic; and (2.) On the basis
of the reasons above, Amaechi henceforth be reflected as the
1st Respondent (in place of Omehia) in the appeal before
them;
5. Contrary to S.246 (3) of
the Constitution which states: The decisions of the Court of
Appeal in respect of appeals arising from election petitions
shall be final", and in clear abuse of court processes,
Amaechi (the beneficiary of the original Supreme Court
Judgment of 25th October, 2007) challenged the Ruling of the
Court of Appeal (Tribunal) at the Supreme Court again; in
effect asking the Supreme Court to upturn the substitution
of Omehia made by the Appeal Court (Tribunal);
6. The Supreme Court (panel
again headed by Justice A.I. Katsina-Alu, JSC with Justice
C.M. Chukwuma-Eneh, JSC sitting) on 2nd June 2009 very
surprisingly, entertained an application of Amaechi's
(challenging the Ruling of the Court of Appeal (Tribunal) in
a Governorship Election matter, at the Supreme Court) and
adjourned the case from 2nd June, 2009 (four full months
away) to 8th October, 2009;
7. Your Lordship, you
reconstituted the panel on 22nd June, 2009 with a full array
of seven (7) Justices of the Supreme Court to hopefully give
the case accelerated hearing since the substantive election
matter was time-barred given the Court of Appeal's
pre-scheduled sitting for 25th June, 2009:
8. In the Supreme Court's
sitting of 22nd June, 2009, Femi Falana. Esq. (Chief Bekinbo
Soberekon's lawyer) relying on S.246 (3) of the
Constitution, pointedly held that the Supreme Court had no
jurisdiction to hear this Amaechi's case; while Justice A.I.
Katsina-Alu, JSC with Justice C.M. Chukwuma-Eneh, JSC
sitting) held that the matter still be delayed and adjourned
till 8th October, 2009 exercising plain authority,
notwithstanding the urgency desirable for the case;
9. Prior to 22nd June,
2009, the same Supreme Court had declared its lawful stand
(which is precedence for itself and plank on which it ought
to stand) giving decisive Judgments. a few of which are as
follows:
ON ABUSE OF COURT PROCESS, 'RES
JUDICATA' AND 'ESTOPPEL',
i. In Yoye VS. Olubode & Ors,
(1974) 10SC. 209, per P. 220 the Supreme Court maintained
that " ... .'Res Judicata'as a successful plea is a bar to
the jurisdiction of the (Supreme) court; as evidence it is
conclusive…”;
ii. In Ude vs. Nwara
(1993) 2SCNJP, per P. 47 the Supreme Court maintained: "By
the operation of the rule of 'Estoppel' a man is not allowed
to blow hot and cold, to affirm at one time and deny at the
other; or as is said, to approbate and reprobate. He cannot
be allowed to mislead another person into believing in a
state of affairs and then turning round to say, to that
person's advantage, that the state of affairs which he had
represented does not exist at all of as represented by him”;
iii. In Buhari vs. Obasanjo, (2004)
114 LRCN. 209, per Pp. 2723 & 2766, the Supreme Court
maintained: “Litigation is not a game of chess where the
players try tricks at each other, to maneuver to get
victory. Litigation is rather a judicial process where all
the cards must be placed on the table of the judicial
process so that parties know in advance the case each has
over the other: "It is elementary law that courts of law,
like nature, do not act in vain but for a purpose, and the
purpose must exist and be identifiable and identified;
Courts of law do not embark on academic exercise because
they are not academic institutions. Courts of this country
are enjoined to exercise their judicial functions within the
provisions of S.6 of the Constitution and the section does
not anticipate exercise of their equitable jurisdiction… In
respect of completed acts";
iv. In Awuse vs Odili, (2004) 114
LRCN 2874 at 2920-2921, the Supreme Court maintained:
"Counsel, who calls on a court to over-rule its earlier
decision, has a Herculean task to satisfy the court that the
decision is wrong in law. He must show that the decision has
caused or perpetuated injustice through the doctrine of
stare decisis, as a desideratum;
v. In Military Governor of
Lagos State vs. Ojukwu. (1986) All NLR. Pt. 1. P 194, it was
maintained that: It is trite law that a party has no right
to take matters into his hands once the court is seized of
it. The decision shows that the court will order a “Status
Quo Ante" in case of breach. What the courts have always
done was to preserve the 'status quo', pending the
determination of the matter, and not to allow a party to be
master of the situation. The 'status quo" to be protected is
the one THAT EXISTED BEFORE THE ILLEGAL ACT of the defendant
which is protected, pending the matters to be determined in
the substantive suit. As In Ojukwu's case, the court had to
protect the illegal eviction pending the determination of
the substantive case pending at the Lagos State High Court.
ON SUPREME COURT ANNULLING ITS
JUDGMENT, OR ADJUDICATING WITHOUT JURISDICTION
vi. Igwe vs. Kalu (2002) FWLR (Pt.
121) 1 the Supreme Court maintained that the Supreme Court
has inherent power 10 set aside its own Judgment when: (a)
The judgment is obtained by fraud or deceit either by the
court or by one or more of the parties. Such a judgment can
be impeached or set aside by means of an action which may be
brought without leave. (b) The judgment is a nullity. A
person affected by it can ex debi to justitae, have it set
aside. (c) It is obvious that the court was misled into
giving judgment under a mistaken belief that the parties
consented to it being given”;
vii. Peter Obi vs INEC & 6 Ors, the
Supreme Court on 13th July, 2007, per lead judgment of
Justice A.I. Katsina-Alu, JSC, in suit no. SC.123/2007; Pp.
9-10 of his "Reasons for Judgment", it was maintained that
by S.285 (2) of the Constitution, only the Governorship
Election Petition Tribunal have the exclusive jurisdiction
to 'validly' declare one's valid election as Governor;
viii. In the words of Lord Denning
in Macfoy vs U.A.C. (1962) AC. 152 at 160, & in Salati vs.
Shehu (1986) All NLR(Pt. 1) Pp. 50-51, it was maintained
that "If an act is void, then it is in law a nullity. It is
not only bad, but incurably bad. There is no need for an
order of court to set it aside. It is automatically null and
void without more ado, though it is sometimes convenient to
have the court declare it to be so. And every proceeding
which is founded on it is also bad and incurably bad. You
cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay there.
It will collapse";
ix Harriman vs Harriman (1987) 6
SCNJ J.P 218, the Supreme Court maintained that "No matter
the exigencies of the frivolities Of the vexatious nature of
the substantive appeal, the Supreme Court cannot hear the
substantive appeal from the ruling of the High Court which
is now pending in the Court of Appeal. To do otherwise, is
to usurp the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal and such
usurpation will certainly amount to the violation of the
Constitution and will therefore be null and void. The
Supreme Court will not do anything of the sort in the same
vein, no matter the problems with the case at the High
Court, Court of Appeal and the political maneuvers, the
court can still not assume jurisdiction over who is validly
elected as Governor under S.285 of the Constitution";
x. LSDPC vs Adeyemi Bero
(2005) 8 NWLR P. 355, it was maintained that "There is a
distinction between an order, or judgment, which a court is
not competent to make, and an order or judgment which if
even erroneous in point of law or in fact is within the
court's jurisdiction, the decision is void. Where a
proceeding is incompetent or without jurisdiction, no right
can be hoisted on it.” It is the duty of the Court to
interpret the words used by legislature and not to interpret
what the legislature has not written or to recommend an
amendment";
xi. Erisis & Ors vs. Idika & 11 Ors
(1987) 11-12 SCN JP.27 at 35-36, it was maintained that "The
Inherent jurisdiction which includes power to make
consequential order, must be with jurisdiction." "In this
case the inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court cannot
empower it to make a consequential order on an issue, that
it lacks jurisdiction";
xii. AG Lagos State vs. Dosunmu
(1989) 6 SCNJ P. 134 at 166, it was maintained that “All
courts in the federation derive their jurisdiction from the
Constitution. Where the Constitution expressly and in clear
and unambiguous terms ousts the jurisdiction of any court of
law from determining a particular Issue or question, then
the court is duty bound to give effect to the ouster: At P.
153: "It is the duty of the courts to expound their
jurisdiction but it is no part of our duty to expand our
jurisdiction";
xiii. Agu vs. Odofin (1992) 2 SCNJ
P.161 & 173, it was maintained that "The competence vel non
of a court is a legal condition which cannot be waived away
by the parties, where the condition of want of competence
exists, it is a fundamental defect fatal to adjudication."
"It is not a mere irregularity which can be cured by
considerations of substantial justice";
xiv. Aqua Ltd. vs. Ondo State
Sports Council (1988) 10-11 SCNJ P. 26 at 52, it was
maintained that: "A right conferred by the Constitution
cannot be taken away by any other provisions except by the
Constitution itself';
xv. The provisions of S.6 of the
Constitution which deal with inherent powers is of
assistance only where there is valid exercise of
jurisdiction. Power cannot be exercised unless where there
is jurisdiction in respect of the subject matter. It is not
exercised in vacuo.
10. As if all this precedence was
not sufficient, even as recent as Monday, 8th June, 2009 and
in the case S.C.21/2009 (Elder Bassey Etim vs. Hon. Emmanuel
Bassey Obot & Ors) five other Justices of the same Supreme
Court (Niki Tobi, A.M. Mukhtar, I.F. Ogbuagu, J.O., with
Justice C. M. Chukwuma-Eneh, JSC sitting) gave another
clearly worded 1-page ruling, thus RULING: “… I am satisfied
that it is an election matter which comes within the
provision of Section 246 of the Constitution. By Section
2.46(3), the decision of the Court of Appeal in respect of
appeal arising from election petitions shall be final. This
court, though the final court of appeal cannot be hungry for
jurisdiction. This court cannot struggle with the Court" of
Appeal for jurisdiction. In the circumstances, the
preliminary objection succeeds. The application filed on 3rd
February, 2009 is struck out. ... ." Delivered by Justice
Niki Tobi, JSC;
11. And in the most recent Supreme
Court Judgment on Andy Uba's Anambra Governor Election
Appeal to it, the Supreme Court strongly tongue-lashed both
politicians and the senior 'silks" who assist them to abuse
court processes, and made a similar award of N30.000 costs.
12. Your lordship, it is not in
doubt how all the above directly and properly relate to
Amaechi's case before the Supreme Court? Other relevant
citations abound!
GIVEN ALL THESE FACTS NOWTHEREFORE
A. The Supreme Court has
put it self, actions and intentions to serious question;
B. The Supreme Court has
also forced the people of Rivers State to question what now
seems to be "justice delayed and denied" asking why
Amaechi's case must be so different from what lawfully
obtained right in the same Supreme Court in consonance with
the provisions of the Constitution and laws of Nigeria?
C. Questions, Questions,
Questions:
1. Notwithstanding the
constitutional, or frivolous, or “extremely important" legal
questions Amaechi may want the Supreme Court to answer,
according to 5.246 (3) of the Constitution, can that
procedure vitiate the provisions of the Nigerian
Constitution and/or ever be used in the final decisions of
the Court of Appeal (Tribunal) in respect of the Guber
Election? Whatever issues, or questions Amaechi raises
concerning the Ruling of the Court of Appeal, cannot be (and
shall not be) entertained if outside of election matters; if
they are election matters. It makes any attention given it
(even just for another hearing) a nullity, fraudulently
contrived and a grave miscarriage of justice!
2. Has the Court of Appeal
(Tribunal) not made its Ruling, and is it not "the"
conclusive pronouncement on the substitution Amaechi is
seeking the Supreme Court to upturn, or determining his
lawful installation as Governor? Is the Court of Appeal
(Tribunal) instead not the "Supreme" court with respects to
Guber Electoral matters?
3. Having been the
beneficiary of the original Supreme Court Judgment of 25th
October, 2007; having substituted Omehia as Governor of
Rivers State for twenty (20) months, and now applying to the
Supreme Court, is Amaechi denying or affirming the fact
consequent upon the Supreme Court Judgment that the Supreme
Court should not have, did not or cannot substitute Omehia
with him? Is he not 'estoppelled' on the matter of
substitution, likewise the Supreme Court?
4. Why is the Supreme Court
entertaining Amaechi's question of its Judgment made on a
clearly pre-election matter (no matter when it was
delivered) to become a post-election Judgment question?
5. Given that the Rivers
State Governorship Election has been held; given that the
original Supreme Court Judgment of 25th October, 2007 did
not, and could not have ruled out lawful challenge of the
elections at the Tribunal (i.e. could not have given the
elections a seal of 100% compliance outside the ambience of
the relevant "Electoral Act 2006" electoral laws ); and
given the undisputed unlawful exclusion of at least one
other party's candidate from the ballot (a violation of the
Electoral laws), then what rules of the Supreme Court, laws
of Nigeria, or provisions of the Constitution does Amaechi
rely on to presume that the original Judgment of the Supreme
Court cannot or should not be subject to S.246 (3) of the
Constitution? Is he there on an academic or political debate
or exercise?
6. Why is the Supreme Court
(according to the Judgment of Justice Niki Tobi, JSC.)
seemingly hungry for jurisdiction, or struggling with the
Court of Appeal (Tribunal) for jurisdiction; and therefore
allowing Amaechi to foist a situation of helplessness (or
anomy) upon itself by entertaining what it did not tolerate
in previous cases before it, and had scolded senior lawyers
who assisted politicians so to do?
7. What is so different
between Rotimi Amaechi's, Emmanuel Obot's, Andy Uba's and
several above-quoted cases, that the urgency of settling a
Governorship Election matter that has lingered for two (2)
years now should be scorned through incessant delays?
8. How come the same panel
headed by Justice A.I. Katsina-Alu, JSC, is being asked to
judge itself on-an original Judgment given by it?
9. If the Supreme Court
wants to justify Amaechi's application for any further
question on its original Supreme Court Judgment that put
Amaechi in office, is the Supreme Court not to blame for
(1.) Not making its Judgment explicit and without
constitutional labyrinths; (2.) Declaring a candidate winner
the way they did: (3.) Building in unnecessary delays to
deny other parties (Amaechi's opponents) justice?
10. When does 'Res Judicata'
apply in the Rivers State Governorship Tribunal?
11. Why is the Supreme Court
again bent on formulating, synthesizing and creating another
shortcut for the same Amaechi, create a situation which by
its previous Supreme Court Judgments is a nullity ab initio;
as it were, to make sure that the interested party, Amaechi,
buys as much time even till eternity, to enjoy1he spoils of
the earlier shortcut designed specially for him?
12. Is the Supreme Court
practicing 'judicious tyranny', just because it is the last
port of call for Nigerians? And what will anybody do if its
judgments are so upheld? What are the consequences of a
decision of the same Supreme Court, without jurisdiction?
13. By the way, if Amaechi
does not think he ought to be substituting Omehia in an
election which Omehia physically ran in, why is he
interested in the automatic and undisputable substitution
made by the Supreme Court, or in the office of Governor of
Rivers State? Should he not just resign? Does he want to
inherit the credit accruable to the Judgment and office, but
reject the liabilities of facing the Tribunal and a re-run
election?
14. Can the Supreme Court be
serving the purpose of justice this way, and what express
purpose do the powers exhibited by the Justices of the
Supreme Court serve by throwing an ongoing Election Tribunal
matter (too long delayed for close to two years) four idle
months away in limbo, from June 2nd to October 8th?
15. Should the Court of
Appeal (Tribunal) not follow its own "legal procedures and
schedule" and simply proceed to give final Judgment in the
Rivers State Guber matter; and should the Supreme Court
challenge?
D. ANARCHY AND ANOMY LOOM WHEN
JUSTICE BECOMES POLITICIZED.
Plainly and clearly put: Without
doubt, what has kept Nigerians from running amok in our
brand of democracy is the water of justice poured from time
to time on the inflamed polity, out of the hallowed chambers
of the judiciary. As the last hope of the common man, it has
by its decisions, rescued this country repeatedly from the
brink each time our politicians take to the path of suicide
and dishonour. However, when the judiciary seems confused
over very dear and straight forward matters, it will soon
talk from both sides of its mouth, thereby adorning the garb
of politicians and muddling up our laws! Or else how do you
explain the seeming confusion of judges?
Who is it that does not know that
the decisions of the court of appeal are FINAL with respects
to appeals arising from Governorship Election petitions?
Every politician knows literate and illiterate: the 'Okada'
rider knows; the 'Molue' driver knows. The only Nigerians
that seem not to know are the judges of the Court of Appeal
(Tribunal) themselves or else, how do you expect the Supreme
Court to remind the Court of Appeal (Tribunal) that their
programme or jurisdiction is very different from that of the
Supreme Court as provided by the Constitution: and that the
Supreme Court has no business or jurisdiction pertaining to
post-election matters arising as appeal from an Election
Tribunal or Governorship Elections.
Putting it simply, the Court of
Appeal (Tribunal) is the OMEGA of all decisions from an
Election Petition touching on National Assembly,
Governorship, or State Legislative elections. The Supreme
Court has no jurisdiction or powers; not even supervision of
the Court of Appeal on those matters because, for those
matters the Court of Appeal (Tribunal) is SUPREME period!
It therefore insults the
intelligence of Nigerians and tries the patience of Rivers
people, for the Court of Appeal (Tribunal) to delay
adjudication of the Rivers State Governorship tussle based
on appeals and applications in the Supreme Court! The result
is that, whereas Delta and Bayelsa States have strategized
on how to move forward with or without militants, Rivers
State has her present Governor distracted by too many court
cases, with militants or criminals continuing with acts of
destabilization in the State.
YOUR LORDSHIP, IN THE INTEREST OF
OUR PEOPLE, YOU MAY WISH TO INTERVENE TO SAVE RIVERS PEOPLE
from this torment by ensuring that the JUDICIARY carry out
the function handed them by the Constitution of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria and save the State from a situation of
anomy and anarchy; saving the Judiciary from ridicule, and
upholding for Nigeria its democracy.
Long may you live!
Emenike Chinda
State Chairman
Datubo Kalada J.
Secretary
CC:
President, Federal Republic of
Nigeria
President, National Judicial
Council
President, Court of Appeal
Attorney General of the Federation.
top^^ |